UK time is: 19:14:27
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Arsenal Owe Barcelona NOTHING

Reports in the British press taht Arsenal have been ordered to pay FC Barcelona 2.2Million are totally false.

It is in fact Arsenal's young starlet Fran Merida has been ordered to pay his former employers the cash for 'formation costs and future value.'

Merida moved to Arsenal last summer after Barcelona made a mistake with contracts, meaning he wasn't tied to the club. Arsenal stepped in and signed the then 16-year-old.

It was after that that Barca took the lad to court to recieve compensation for his move, rather than seeking it from Arsenal.

After a court battle lasting nearly a year, Merida, 17, yes that's right - SEVENTEEN has been orderd to pay his former employers the massive sum.

It is, however, expected that Arsenal will pay the money on Fran's behalf.

Considering the potential of the player, 2.2Million is nothing compared to what Barca will be offering in 5 or 6 years time to take him back to Spain.




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Join the Vital Fantasy Football League - its Free!

The Journalist

Writer: Nick Simmonett  Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Wednesday October 10 2007

Time: 7:17PM

Your Comments (oldest first)

Change to most recent first
hope to see him play soon in CC.
fcdematthew
Report Abuse
10/10/2007 19:34:00

2.2Million is too much isnt it?
afghenry
Report Abuse
10/10/2007 19:39:00

He'd be worth paying it for, he is very talented, see him in the youth cup last year at the emirates, he oozed class, seems to have that extra second on the ball like fabregas. Cannot see him ever going back to Barca if thats how they treat him, he was 16 when he left them, i suspect it was more natural talent than their training, 2milllion is a bit harsh.
Harry671
Report Abuse
10/10/2007 19:41:00

I before E except after C.
BlackRed
Report Abuse
10/10/2007 19:47:00

Getting a judgement of 2.2m against a 17 yr old is pretty pathetic imo. Why shouldn't he choose to further his career elsewhere? You'd have thought they'd have learned from losing Cesc. I'm sure we'll pay it, but it's petty and vindictive on Barca's part. They had their "revenge" for Cesc and Meridia by whoring themselves to Henry for 4 years. Ultimatelty they were a match made in heaven.
FAB 4
Report Abuse
10/10/2007 20:09:00

There is one thing we owe them Simmo and that's a damn good thrashing at the Luzhniki stadium on May 21st 2008 ;)
nikolaijns
Report Abuse
10/10/2007 20:13:00

oh, niko, don't give me ideas! a re-run, just like Milan got, would be manna from heaven. What are the odds that Lehmann gets sent off again after 12 minutes?
afri-gooner
Report Abuse
10/10/2007 20:33:00

dont worry,i will be playing for THE ARSENAL first team soon,and that 2.2 million will be money well spent....watch this space
fran merida
Report Abuse
10/10/2007 20:45:00

About the same as Sol popping up and getting a goal Afri-gooner!!
nikolaijns
Report Abuse
10/10/2007 20:55:00

haha so true niko. This is ridculous for a court to order a 17 year old to pay 2.2 million to a football club. What kinda of person would do that to a kid?
gunnerkid107
Report Abuse
10/10/2007 21:17:00

It's not so different to the deal that we paid for Cesc. Arsenal reportedly handed over 1mn euros and cancelled a remaining payment of 1.5mn owing from the Overmars/Petit deal. Also all in all about 2.2mn. I guess that was good value and hopefully Merida will prove a good investment.
Amos.
Report Abuse
10/10/2007 21:43:00

This does sound strange. Does anyone have a link to the full story behind his signing? If it was so simple as Merida being free and signing for whoever he wanted, the court would not have ruled against him (or so I would presume, logically).
prits
Report Abuse
10/10/2007 21:45:00

I googled the story, and I cannot find the logic behind this fine. Arsenal and Merida did nothing against the laws. I dont even see where this was unethical. Merida simply thought his career would be better off at Arsenal. What the hell is the logic in getting a 17 year old to pay a club like Barca 2.2M? I must admit I'm stumped.
prits
Report Abuse
10/10/2007 22:52:00

What about liverpool and man unites they also got players with these types of transfers why are they not getting punished.
AB_Arsenal
Report Abuse
11/10/2007 01:57:00

Considering we earn 3.1m every match, i don't think it'll do us any harm in just paying the money. The youngster has immense potential. I saw him in the Under-17s world cup and he was one of the reasons Spain reached the finals.
WouldYouBelieveIt?!
Report Abuse
11/10/2007 03:31:00

Barca screwed up the contracts and now wants us to pay compensation??? Totally absurd!!!
stukazufuss
Report Abuse
11/10/2007 05:42:00

This isn't a ruling by FIFA or UEFA this is an action taken in the Spanish Civil Courts by Barcelona against Merida on the basis of the 8 years training he received and him then walking out some months before he joined Arsenal. Apparently there is to be an appeal and if so it hasn't reached the end but in principle it seems fair that if a club educates a player for 8 years they should get something back for it unless they release him voluntarily.
Amos.
Report Abuse
11/10/2007 08:48:00

spainish dogs.. dats why i like valencia, RM and barca are just crooks
korodon
Report Abuse
11/10/2007 09:19:00

Spain is a horrible country. the national coach of the spanish team made the most racist remark ever made in football towards Henry ,and how was he punished? 2000 euros. so this is no shocker..
luckys_10
Report Abuse
11/10/2007 09:29:00

I do agree that they should be paid for their efforts in developing him - anything else is unfair. On the other hand this is the same damn club that wants to take Fabregas in the summer or anyone else their President/PR take a fancy to in the summer. So yeah, let's pay the buggers but lets make sure it's long and drawn out just like their tapping up campaigns.
Andy-bayor
Report Abuse
12/10/2007 00:49:00

According to one Barcelona blog the Spanish judge making this decision if favour of Barcelona is a member of their fan club. Reportedly the matter is being refered to the European Court of Arbitration.
Amos.
Report Abuse
12/10/2007 09:23:00

It may seem fair in principle to compensate Barca, though I dont completey agree with it. The life of a professional footballer is so unpredictable - how can they be certain Merida will make so much in future ? In that sense, the judgment is flawed as far as the amount is concerned, especially if the fine is to be borne by the player personally. Moving away from looking at the situation logically, this must be what they call 'karma' for Barca :).
prits
Report Abuse
12/10/2007 14:00:00

 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Arsenal Articles

Archived Arsenal Articles

List All Vital Arsenal Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll
ScoopDragon Premier League Network Sites

Vital Members League (view all)

1. Amos. 38
2. Naijagunner 34
3. Hobart67 19
4. paul_ownz 19
5. Galway Gooner 16
6. Nwankwo25 13
7. shewore 10
8. Joe_@** 9
9. phreddy 7
10. Rocky7 5

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
1. Chelsea 33 23 8 2 +39 77
2. Man City 34 20 7 7 +34 67
3. Arsenal 33 20 7 6 +31 67
4. Man Utd 34 19 8 7 +25 65
5. Liverpool 33 17 7 9 +11 58
6. Spurs 34 17 7 10 +6 58
7. Southampton 34 17 6 11 +21 57

Breaking League News

Hull v Liverpool - Team Sheets
Hull City : 28/04/2015 19:06:00
Something to Mull Over!
Chelsea : 28/04/2015 18:28:00
USA Pre-Season Tour Update
Man Utd : 28/04/2015 17:59:00
Hammers Linked with French Striker
West Ham : 28/04/2015 17:53:00
Hernandez in Swap Deal
Man Utd : 28/04/2015 17:48:01

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Burnley v Arsenal
Suggested By:  Site Staff
Arsenal win 91%
Burnley win 6%
Draw 3%