Vital Football

Latest Arsenal FC News

Death of the Strike Partnership?

Death of the Strike Partnership?

Like every other walk of life, football is a constantly evolving entity. Fads and fashions are adopted and just as quickly dropped and sometimes there is a permanent seismic shift in philosophy. For instance, the patented Herbert Chapman WM formation sped up the evolution of world football and facilitated a shift in the way the game was played. Nowadays, you'd be hard pushed to find a single team in the world that persists with this system. Recently, we seem to be witnessing another implicit shift.

Strike partnerships have long been a celebrated facet of the successful team. A gander back into Arsenal's history will throw out Kennedy and Radford, Wright and Smith and Bergkamp and Henry. At the dawn of the technicolour Premiership era, Shearer and Sutton, Hughes and McClair and Rush and Fowler were dominating the league. The imports of Cantona, Bergkamp and Zola, together with the evergreen guile of Teddy Sheringham and Matt Le Tissier saw the dynamic alter slightly, as the deep lying striker facilitating the arch marksman became all the rage. At Arsenal, it is difficult to think of a more complimentary and talented front two than Bergkamp and Henry. Both players concur in a swooning of mutual admiration. However, in the last couple of years, we have seen the presence of the deadly strike duo evaporate. This is partly to do with the modern adoption of squad rotation as the demands of top flight football together with the inestimable wealth of football's superpowers meant resting players became all the rage. Teams were forced to become more fluid in their approach to attacking. However, despite this trend, teams still tend to favour a solid centre half and central midfield partnership. Carvalho and Terry, Gallas and Toure, Fabregas and Flamini, Rio and Vidic. Stability still rules in other areas of the pitch.

Some might point to the recent trend for negative football, as the lone powerful striker has ushered in a new era. Hitting long balls to Drogba worked a treat for Chelsea, just as Charisteas' eye for goal helped a mean Greece side to Euro 2004 glory. But the signs were there a lot earlier. In the late 90s, a flood of continental strikers emerged. Virtuosos who redefined the role of central striker. Raul, Henry, Shevchenko and Ronaldo (the fat one) were strikers who did more than just loiter in penalty boxes. Even van Nistelrooy gets through his fair share of work on the half way line. All are roughly the same age. The sight of a central striker drifting out to the left wing to get involved in the build up play would have seemed fanciful in the days of Rush, Lineker and Shearer. France managed to win the 1998 World Cup with the ignonimous Stephane Guivarc'h playing as a lone striker, the current Portuguese 'golden generation' is hardly stacked with Eusebios. In more recent times, the likes of Eto'o and Torres have taken their queue from the early millennium trailblazers. Both tend to play as lone strikers, despite not having the physical attributes of a Drogba or an Adebayor as a result of this shift in the role of the striker.

This is much to the detriment of Michael Owen for example, who burst onto the scene as a poacher when Shaearer and Wright were entering their twilight years. But it is no longer enough for a centre forward to slide into anonimity awaiting a chance in the six yard box. Even arch goalhanger Owen has recently looked to reinvent himself into a withdrawn striker in an attempt to refamiliarise himself with a game that looks to be passing his outmoded talents by. Our own Eduardo has a fearsome reputation as an ice cold penalty box predator, perhaps no coincidence that Adebayor's goals dried up in coincidence with Eddie's injury. However, this sidesteps the fact that Eduardo has spent the majority of his Arsenal career to date on the left wing. Eduardo is a player in tune with a role that would have been much different to his striking idols when he was learning his trade. Arsenal spent many a season floundering in the Champions League until, by happy serendipity, Wenger stumbled upon the 4-5-1 formation which took them to the final in 2006.

Mainly as a consequence of van Persie's persistent injuries, contemporary Arsenal often line up with Adebayor as a lone striker, aided and abetted by playmakers Fabregas, Hleb, Rosicky and now Nasri. This allows for a more fluid approach. Jose Mourinho found success by using Drogba as a lone battering ram, flanked by two raised wingers. A look at the movers and shakers in football reveals no tangible strike partnerships. Spain and Liverpool deploy Torres as a lone frontman backed by a five strong midfield, Chelsea never did amalgamate Shevchenko and Drogba as a feared duo whilst poachers such as Kezman and Pizarro fell by the wayside. Manchester United seem to have hammered the final nail in the coffin by winning the league and Champions' League without playing a fixed striker. Tevez and Rooney work the opposition half and liberate Ronaldo to wander into the box. In the 1980s it would have been unfathomable to see a side win the league without a predator extraordinaire. One would have to wander how Lineker and Rush would adapt to the demands of the modern game.

Whilst someone like Pipo Inzaghi might be quite glad to be in the twilight of his career given the current climate, his ex team mate Gilardino seems to have been left behind in the modern game. A couple of seasons back, Arsenal's reserves featured Bendtner and Lupoli as a complimentary and prolific duo. But Wenger chose to give the more rounded Bendtner his chance, whilst the more one dimensional Lupoli has been consigned to the scrapheap. United's Giuseppe Rossi has suffered the same fate. It seems as though we might never again see a terrible twosome tearing up the top flights of European football. The goal poacher has become ousted by his leaner, fitter and more energetic cousin. Is this a constant shift in the world of football? Will my children look at me blankly when I utter the words 4-4-2 the same way I am a tabula rasa at the suggestion of the five man forward lines of the 1930s? Time, as ever, will tell.LD



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer:Tim Stillman
Date:Saturday July 12 2008
Time: 4:19PM

Comments

0
Interesting theme that. Arsenal have played with fluid strikers for sometime. Whether with Anelka and Bergkamp or Henry and Bergkamp the attacking threat depended as much on the 'midfield', Overmars, Pires, Ljungberg, Wiltord switching position with one or more of the front two. In fact last season Adebayor was as close as we have been to having even one out and out 'striker' for sometime. But you're right that 4-5-1 with 3 attacking midfielders is the pattern we'll see for a while I expect.
Amos.
12/07/2008 16:42:00
0
how about these partnerships? Zlatan-Crespo/Cruz (inter) Toni-Klose (bayern) Villa-Torres (Spain) Del Piero-Trezuguet (Juve) I think there is still a place for strike-partnersips. while not easy, juventus under tinkerman of all ppl managed to have 2 strikers of great understanding playing in tandem, both scoring lots of goals in the italian leagu! afterall, its the players that forms how the team plays. i believe it is the lack of players with great understanding (it takes time), rather than the failure of the formation, that caused managers to abandon them.
korodon
12/07/2008 16:52:00
0
Teams like Arsenal, Milan, Barca et al can thrive quite nicely with just one striker because of the way they move the ball and the presence of pacey wingers. Chelsea struggles to score goals and create chances for Drogba when he plays in a 4-3-3 for Chelsea since the departure of Robben and Duff. If you do not have players who threaten with speed and crossing ability, the lone striker is doomed.
Drogstark
12/07/2008 17:13:00
0
berba/keane say no more but honestly more top teams are tryin the lone stricker role with attacting midfielders, its bascically 451 with out ball an attack like 433.
123spurs
12/07/2008 17:25:00
0
To be fair, that was an interesting read, and in many ways a lot of it makes sense. But there still are a fair share of good partnerships (yes I will mention Keane and Berba) but you are right in thinking looking at the top teams in the league for example a lot of teams dont play a regular 2 up top. Mpre often than not a 4-2-3-1, 4-3-3 4-1-4-1 are formations more used by sides in todays game.
matt..shelfsidespurs
12/07/2008 17:55:00
0
why we have so many spuds reading our website i cannot comprehend.
gooner_till_i_die
12/07/2008 18:25:00
0
cos there's naff all worth reading on their own site! Nice article by the way!
merlin
12/07/2008 18:29:00
0
Good article, but I think Korodon makes a good point. The speed at which players change clubs in search of more money or whatever, maybe does not allow enough time for such partnerships to flourish.
Passenal
12/07/2008 18:42:00
0
If we had Van Persie or Eduardo fit last season we would have had a strike partnership. All clubs who have two good strikers have partnerships, the trouble is that most clubs have one that is the mainstay and the rest are crud (Man Utd have Roonay - Tevez, Spurs have Berba - Keane whereas Everton have Yakubu and the useless Johnson and Liverpool have Torres and nobody else worth mentioning) It is also worth noting that some teams have wingers or attacking midfielders that have partnerships with the strikers. Cesc - Ade, gerrard - Torres, Arteta - Yakubu, Lampard - Drogba etc.
Goofle
12/07/2008 20:53:00
0
a very good article. thanks. there are a few good partnerships out there but no doubt they're a dying breed.
RadioactiveD
12/07/2008 21:11:00
Page 1/2
  1. 1
  2. 2

Login to post a comment

Recent Arsenal Articles

Campbell - There's More To Come From Bellerin

Brotherly love

Premier League To Undergo Rebraning

Exciting news ... or just news ... sort of ...

Flamini - I Wasn't Trying To Hurt Him

Arsenal midfielder on his two footed tackle

Rambo - We Needed That Badly

Rambo on massive win at the weekend

Archived Vital Arsenal Articles

Vital Arsenal articles from

Site Journalists

Rocky7
Profile
ClockEnd124
Profile
Amos
Profile

Current Poll (see more polls)

MOTM vs Cech
Suggested By:
Cech8%
Petr Cech92%
ScoopDragon Premier League Network Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
1 Leicester City 25 15 8 2 53 20
2 Spurs 25 13 9 3 48 26
3 Arsenal 25 14 6 5 48 17
4 Man City 25 14 5 6 47 21
5 Man Utd 25 11 8 6 41 10
6 West Ham 25 10 9 6 39 9
7 Southampton 25 10 7 8 37 9
8 Everton 25 8 11 6 35 12
9 Liverpool 25 9 8 8 35 -4
10 Watford 25 9 6 10 33 0
11 Stoke 25 9 6 10 33 -7
12 Crystal Palace 25 9 5 11 32 -4
13 Chelsea 25 7 9 9 30 -2
14 WBA 25 7 8 10 29 -9
15 AFC Bournemouth 25 7 7 11 28 -12
16 Swansea 25 6 9 10 27 -9
17 Newcastle 25 6 6 13 24 -18
18 Norwich 25 6 5 14 23 -20
19 Sunderland 25 5 5 15 20 -19
20 Aston Villa 25 3 7 15 16 -20
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News

Arsenal Fixtures (view all)

Feb 14 2016 12:00PM : Leicester City (H)
Barclays Premier League
Feb 20 2016 3:00PM : Hull City (H)
FA Cup
Feb 28 2016 2:05PM : Manchester United (a)
Barclays Premier League
Mar 2 2016 7:45PM : Swansea City (H)
Barclays Premier League
Mar 5 2016 12:45PM : Tottenham Hotspur (a)
Barclays Premier League
Mar 12 2016 5:30PM : West Bromwich Albion (H)
Barclays Premier League

Recent Arsenal Results (view all)

Vital Members League Table

RankNamePoints
1.Naijagunner10
2.Afcdc3
3.Galway Gooner2
4.Amos.1
5.Riversider1
6.Catcatcher 1
7.Wyn Mills1
8.princeoflove9091
9.Joe_@**1
10.Guyfox1