Vital Football

Latest Arsenal FC News

Enough Is Enough

Enough Is Enough

It has long been apparent to anybody with the cranial capacity equitable to that of a hamster that the English Football Association is constituted of a bunch of lazy, subservient gimps with a messiah complex. If you apply any sort of intelligent thinking to their decisions, you`ll see little more than mealy mouthed platitudes and media friendly bluster. The fact is and always has been that they take their cue from the media with Pavlovian quiescence, if they can get away with sitting on their fat arses and doing nothing, they will. For instance, they have always hid firmly behind the rulebook and pleaded indifference whenever a clearly horrific challenge receives a yellow card, "the referee dealt with it, our hands are tied." (I`m not even sure I understand the logic of this rule other than the fact that it precludes the F.A. from having to do any sort of work). Of course, when the media furore surrounding Ben Thatcher`s despicable elbow on Pedro Mendes reached fever pitch, the F.A. all of a sudden decided that that particular law was not so rigid after all. Thatcher was booked for the challenge, but after a sustained media campaign for the F.A. to do their job, they buckled and gave him a six match ban. Back in 1999 Patrick Vieira caused a media storm by spitting at Neil Ruddock and was given a six match suspension. In May 2000, Mustapha Hadji of Coventry was sent off for spitting at a Derby player and was awarded a one match ban. A fortnight after the mega hyped 'battle of Old Trafford` between Arsenal and United in September 2003, when four Arsenal players were banned for, errr, pushing. (Can anyone show me any footage of a blow being landed in that handbags melee?) West Brom and Fulham brawled, with Neil Clement and Andrew Cole landing a series of punches at one another. No extra punishment was meted out. The size of the media storm informs the severity of the punishment.

Today, the F.A. have had absolutely zero compunction about confirming all of the above. Last month, Sheffield United`s Chris Morgan hospitalized Barnsley`s Iain Hume with a pre meditated elbow to the head leaving Hume with a fractured skull and internal bleeding to the head. Since undergoing surgery, which left Hume with an unsightly scar which runs from ear to ear over the top of his cranium, the Barnsley striker had to spend another spell in hospital after complaining of severe dizziness and vomiting. Chris Morgan and Sheffield United are yet to even offer an apology. (Presumably for fear of admitting culpability and facing the accompanying legal music). Morgan was booked for the "challenge", which was precise and measured in my opinion. Hume had even complained to the referee several times in the build up to the incident of Morgan elbowing him persistently. Today, the Football Association have announced that no further action will be taken against Morgan, hiding behind that old familiar "the referee dealt with it at the time" fallacy. Strange how that rule didn`t apply when a comparable incident occurred in the media glare of the Premier League two seasons ago.

That the F.A. are prepared to admit that endangering the life of a fellow professional is only worthy of a yellow card is disgusting in itself. But what really rankles is that they are willing to all but admit that their interest in an incident is measured by the size of its media profile. In other words, the health and wellbeing of a Championship footballer is expendable. Not only does that set the moral compass twitching to somewhere close to 'despicable`, but it is yet another example of how the F.A. are in dereliction of duty. Hiding behind their supposed (selective) subservience to FIFA, they actually cannot be bothered to ensure that maliciously elbowing an opponent, to the point that his life is threatened, should be dealt with and punished appropriately. But because this incident attracted little media attention, it has not been worth dealing with in the way the Thatcher incident was. This incongruous approach to discipline and ensuring the health and safety of the players reveals two entirely unforgivable facets of this F.A. 1) That they are inauspiciously idle. Would they really have attracted a lot of ire from the media or their supposed puppet masters FIFA had they taken appropriate action against Morgan? After all, in the wake of Eduardo`s injury (obtained in a televised match by a player playing for the side leading the Premiership table) Sepp Blatter threatened to intervene and extend Martin Taylor`s ban. This is an act borne out of pure laziness. 2) They are 100% informed by the media and trial by media is a dangerous and gloriously undemocratic approach. In other words, the only time they`ll get off their fat arses to do anything, is when the media brews enough of a storm to compromise their image. They are more than prepared to be weak and lazy, so long as they are not caught in the act. Aristotle once said, "You become just by performing just actions, temperate by performing temperate actions and brave by performing brave actions." Chris Morgan and the F.A. fail on all three counts.LD.



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer:Tim Stillman
Date:Thursday November 27 2008
Time: 1:41PM

Best of Vital Network

Vital Boxing - Can Crolla Beat Linares?

Comments

0
Head. Nail. Hitting sound.
ChaosTeaCup
27/11/2008 14:29:00
0
Tim, nothing will ever be done about the dangerous challenges until some player looses his life.
Armory
27/11/2008 14:31:00
0
Enough doesn't appear to be enough for the FA - That's the problem.
Rocky7
27/11/2008 14:48:00
0
Player celebrates with crowd or by taking shirt off yellow card, player fractures fellow pros skull yellow card? Drogba was booked for the incident in relation to the coin throwing..... Mass hysteria on the back pages, incident shown from 15 angles. Where is the justice?
iceman10
27/11/2008 15:08:00
0
If Iain Hume actually had been killed, what would the F.A. have done? On one hand, they couldn't seriously have hidden behind their non existent rule of "the referee dealt with it." But there again, it wouldn't have surprised me much if they had. I saw an interview with Hume on SSN last week and the scar is horrible, they had to cut his whole head open and if he's still experiencing nausea and vomiting, it's reasonable to assume that not only will his career be adversely affected, but so might his quality of life. I hope Hume sues Morgan and Sheffield United. How ironic that the Blades are currently squealing for loss of earnings from West Ham United, but refuse to apologise for nearly curtailing the life of a fellow pro, where are their lofty principles now?
Little Dutch
27/11/2008 15:49:00
0
Here's a decent letter on it from F365 today, "The FA Don't Want Reasoned Opinion We could all phone the FA's 'Fans View Line' to complain about the non-punishment of Chris Morgan. The number is 020 7745 4999 but there isn't an e-mail option. I would've thought that it is easier to delete e-mail messages than phone messages but I suppose they might make a few quid out of the calls. I'm surprised it's not a premium rate number really, as with some of their decisions they could make a killing (here's hoping I haven't given them another idea). Anyway, there are lots of ways you can contact the FA - see here http://www.thefa.com/TheFA/ContactUs/Postings/2005/03/Contact_Us, but it's only the 'Fans View Line' that doesn't allow an email. I think that this is because they don't want reasoned debate and they can also screen out lots of messages out that are 'offensive', which is probably handy for them as once you've made the call it is physically impossible in stopping yourself calling Mr unaccountable FA man anything other than an unrepeatable. How many fans who are angry and mystified by the latest FA outrage can really muster a coherent argument in a phone call? This must help our ridiculous governing body's probable assumption that we're all stupid, but how many top journalists like Martin Samuel of the Times can write their columns in one go on a dictaphone? Keep Trev, sack the rest, until they start making an effort to engage in common sense - and the footballing public in general. Dave (tried phoning them but fluffed my lines) Atherton
Little Dutch
27/11/2008 15:51:00
0
The dispicable lack of action from the FA and sheer unadulterated laziness in dealing with that s***bag Morgan is just the icing on the cake. Don't forget they are still technically an amateur organisation running a professional game. The blatent hypocrasy shown when dealing with Viera and Hadji (name?) of Coventry sums up their inability and idleness to a tea! LD you hit the nail squarely there old chap. How long before clubs stop appealing to the giverning body and actually take the opposing team into the law courts? If they show this level of inaction in the near future this will become the norm.
LondonGooner
27/11/2008 16:16:00
0
Good article! When Aliadiere gave whoever it was (I don't remember) a little slap he received a 3(?) match ban which was increased to 4(?) on appeal. There is an enormous inconsistency in the refereeing at football matches and in the attitude of the FA. I think you said it all.
norfolk dumpling
27/11/2008 16:55:00
0
Btw, who is the person "LD" writing all these articles?
nevidimka
27/11/2008 18:19:00
0
Little Dutch
Tom14
27/11/2008 18:26:00
Page 1/4
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Login to post a comment

Recent Arsenal Articles

Stats: Watford v Arsenal

All the stats from Watford (1) vs (3) Arsenal, Vicarage Road, 27/8/16 Att: 20,545

Team Sheets - Watford v Arsenal

Watford are at Vicarage Road with Arsenal the visitors today, this is a 3pm kick-off - the line-ups have been confirmed.

Follow Watford v Arsenal On Twitter

Arsenal go to Vicarage Road as the visitors to Watford today, this will be a 3pm kick-off.

Watford v Arsenal - Vital Pre-Match

Arsenal collected a first point of the season at Champions Leicester last Saturday, defensively it was tighter but the Gunners couldn't breakthrough. Tomorrow we're off to Watford.

Archived Vital Arsenal Articles

Vital Arsenal articles from

Site Journalists

Rocky7
Editor email
Profile
ClockEnd124
no email
Profile
Amos
no email
Profile

Current Poll (see more polls)

Watford MotM
Suggested By: Site Staff
Cech0%
Bellerin0%
Holding0%
Koscielny0%
Monreal0%
Cazorla0%
Xhaka25%
Walcott0%
Ozil0%
Oxlade-Chamberlain0%
Sanchez75%
Sub - Wilshere0%
Sub - Elneny0%
Sub - Gibbs0%
ScoopDragon Premier League Network Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
1 Chelsea 3 3 0 0 9 5
2 Man Utd 3 3 0 0 9 5
3 Everton 3 2 1 0 7 2
4 Man City 2 2 0 0 6 4
5 Hull City 3 2 0 1 6 2
6 Spurs 3 1 2 0 5 1
7 Arsenal 3 1 1 1 4 1
8 Middlesbrough 2 1 1 0 4 1
9 Leicester City 3 1 1 1 4 0
10 Liverpool 3 1 1 1 4 -1
11 WBA 2 1 0 1 3 0
12 West Ham 2 1 0 1 3 0
13 Burnley 3 1 0 2 3 -2
14 Swansea 3 1 0 2 3 -2
15 Southampton 3 0 2 1 2 -2
16 Sunderland 3 0 1 2 1 -2
17 Crystal Palace 3 0 1 2 1 -2
18 Watford 3 0 1 2 1 -3
19 AFC Bournemouth 3 0 1 2 1 -3
20 Stoke 3 0 1 2 1 -4
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News

Recent Arsenal Results (view all)

Vital Members League Table

RankNamePoints
1.Naijagunner9
2.5102
3.Joe_@**1