UK time is: 22:31:38
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Devil in the Dominance?

It has now been two years since an English side was knocked out of the Champions` League by a team from outside of England. As three English sides line up for the European Cup semi finals this morning- guaranteeing England`s presence in European football`s showpiece final for the fifth season in a row, we are a matter of hours away from hearing one or both of Pratini and Bladder aim their pernicious bile towards these shores once more. Corporate behemoth Bladder will likely lecture us about the travails of money and its evil influence upon the beautiful game. Of course, being such a bastion of Marxist principle, Bladder has brokered sponsorship tie ins with Budweiser, McDonalds, Continental, Coca Cola etc, etc. Meanwhile, Pratini (or Tweedle Dumb) will send teary eyed rhetoric sailing our way on a raft of salty tears about the over reliance on foreign players and how England`s cosmopolitan model is damaging for the sport. That would be Pratini the Frenchman who made his name at a small club in the French provinces, Juventus I think they`re called. We come to expect this hypocrisy and thinly veiled prejudice from these two idiots, who should probably conserve some of their bellicose energies on countering corruption and hooliganism in Italy and racism in Spain. However, the valid question remains as to how good is the current domination of England sides for the sport as an entity? Does it reveal hegemony based on unequal distribution of wealth? Is it a cyclical quirk of history? Or are England`s top four clubs simply better managed with better players?

It`s a question the British media has wrestled with for the last twelve months or so, it`s perhaps a curiously British reserve to complain about and find fault with our own supremacy. Of course England`s current solstice in the Champions League is nothing new, as far back as the Fifties, Real Madrid won the title six times in ten years from 1956-1966. A.C. Milan won it three times in five years from 1989-1994, Ajax and Munich duopolised the trophy in the six years between 1971-76 whilst Forest, Villa and Liverpool ensured England dominated in the early 80s. Now it simply looks to be the Premiership`s turn again in the cycle. However, football has changed and the rewards are far greater, prize money and television money has lead to endemic chasms not apparent before. The Premiership earns more in the way of television money than any other nation, allowing its competing teams to pay egregious sums in wages and transfer fees. Whilst English sides continue to dominate in Europe, this vicious cycle is likely to continue, with ever more salacious television companies pouring more into the coffers and ever more prize money finding its way into the trough of England`s Big Four, the competition, both domestic and European, dwindles and trembles in the face of its corporate might. While there is some truth here, anomalies lurk beneath the numbers. Madrid newspaper AS greeted Ronaldo`s stunning strike against Porto with the line, "Madrid`s next superstar hits a stunning winner against Porto" as the Spanish giants prepare a reported £70m bid. Bayern Munchen trailed Barcelona by four goals on Tuesday night, yet still had £12m worth of striker in Lukas Podolski on the substitutes bench. Internazionale Milano are hardly paupers themselves, so perhaps it is a little astounding to see such company claim poverty? Particularly when you consider that Arsenal fielded only one player who cost more than £10m last night (that fee is still being paid in instalments on the purchase of a 17 year old from Southampton). Perhaps Arsenal are the biggest anomaly on the whole argument, the Tottenham reserve side that beat Arsenal`s reserves on Tuesday night cost more than Arsenal`s first team in a Champions League Quarter Final. (The player that won that reserve game for Spurs came from Arsenal`s academy). Manchester City and Aston Villa outspend Arsenal all ends up, yet still we are a constant presence in the knockout stages. Relative paupers Villarreal outperformed their state welfare endorsed cousins Real Madrid in this year`s competition.

The question of the influence of rich benefactors will undoubtedly be proffered by some, yet this only realistically applies to Chelsea- who were a Champions League side pre Abramovic- though it`s foolhardy to dismiss his influence. Liverpool are certainly no richer than the aforementioned European giants, United earned their wealth with a cunningly executed corporate growth strategy allied by success on the pitch reared through their youth teams, whilst Arsenal are generally regarded as the financially most prudent club in England and manfully resist all talk of takeovers. Could it be that perhaps our clubs are being run much better? That we don`t indulge in the circus of sacking manager after manager and the constant politicking of "vote for me and I`ll buy player x" leading to instability and the inability to build a dynasty in the Ferguson and Wenger moulds? (Again, Chelsea are excluded from this point). Italy were the dominant league of the late 80s and early 90s but, like Icarus, they flew too close to the sun and greed took over. The avarice in the renegotiation of television deals caused clubs to breakaway and negotiate their own satellite packages, which proved to be disastrous. The public in Italy were turned off of football and attendances dwindled, corruption reigned and hooliganism reared its ugly head once more. (Naturally, UEFAs bigwigs rewarded them by allowing them to host the final. Morons). There are certainly lessons to be gleaned for the Premier League, particularly the smarmy Scudamore and his ridiculously vein attempts to champion the "greed is good" ethos in our league, but at this moment English clubs are being run better by managers and owners alike (again, Chelsea accepted). In fact, I would argue that Europe`s top four managers are currently plying their trade in our league and the management of resources by Ferguson, Benitez and Wenger surpasses that of other continental clubs because their structures are not quite as secure. (Hiidink is possibly the world`s finest coach, but has not had the luxury of managing Chelsea`s resources). That said, I think there is a case for a ruling decreeing that a club can only spend 50% of its turnover on salaries rather than doping the principles of the sport with steroid like cash injections from oligarchs.

Pratini if fond of prattling on about the lack of investment in young native players and sees quotas as a way of convalescing European competition back to health. His prime target here is unabashedly against English sides that do not rear their own talent and instead poach from abroad. That`s a view that is uncomfortably parochial for my liking; does it really matter if a young player is from Newbury or Norway? I`m not sure it matters much to me. But this is an argument that is easily deconstructed. Firstly, I dare say the right wing British press or Pratini took much note of Porto`s starting line up last night, if they had they would have discovered only two Portuguese players. Incidentally, in Ronaldo and Nani, United ended the game with the same amount. If one is to look at the playing squads given on the official websites of the leading clubs from Italy, Spain and England, they show that Barcelona boasts 12 Spanish players, Manchester United 11 English players and Inter Milan six Italians. Poaching young players from abroad, apparently a massive crime is hardly the sole preserve of English sides when you consider that Barca`s jaw dropping front line includes Lionel Messi and Samuel Eto`o. I`ll leave you to research exactly how those players were procured. Barcelona have shown an immense aptitude for taking young players from South America (Spurs reject Giovani dos Santos was parachuted in from the Catalonian village of, erm, Mexico). Chelsea and Real Madrid eschew this model altogether, in fact, if Madrid stopped chasing ageing supermodels and invested in some provincial teen beauty queens, they might be able to build a long and fruitful dynasty rather than these constant sugar daddy marriages of convenience which inevitably end in messy divorce.

Whilst English sides current pre eminence showcases their collective quality, one does have to seriously question what this current command says about our own indigenous league. Whilst the "Big Four" continue to rule the roost at home and abroad, the chasing pack flatter to deceive. Despite massive, massive investment in players, Tottenham continue to stumble backwards (and how we love reminding them), Villa have broken the bank but have faltered in the race for a top four slot that seemed a certainty six weeks ago. In the UEFA Cup, English sides exercise no such prevalence, with most going so far as to completely disregard the tournament as a nuisance. Since 2000-01, only three sides have broken the current top four strangle hold on Champions League competition. Everton and Newcastle- who could not make it past the preliminary stage- and Leeds United, currently of League One. Compare and contrast to Spain- who have put forward twelve sides since 2000-01 in this tournament, Italy who have offered seven of their finest, Germany nine and France eight- all of whom made it to the group stages. Leeds United`s semi final appearance against Valencia in 2001 was the last time the Premiership was represented by someone other than the Big Four in a bona fide Champions League match. The question is, should we worry less about English sides` domination of the Champions League than the predominance of these sides in this country?

I would not necessarily argue that the Premiership`s Indian sign over Europe is a positive or healthy thing necessarily, but I refuse to believe that sides of the size, vintage and wealth of Real Madrid, Bayern Munchen, Juventus and Barcelona cannot overcome it with better management of resources and players. Barca have now been the only side to prevent an English whitewash of the semi finals for two years running, though they have been knocked out by English opposition in the last two years. Unless they run out eventual winners this year, it is a fate that awaits them for a third year in a row. I happen to think Chelsea will knock them out, Barcelona are in scintillating form but they have been waltzing to La Liga title for months with a current goal difference of +63. That means they have not had to contend with challenging opposition on many occasions this season, will they cope with a game as tight as the one with Chelsea is likely to be? They could not against United last season when they failed to score in the available 180 minutes. Whilst the league table usually ends with a familiar tinge in England, the individual games tend to be more physically demanding. The Premiership is the fastest, most demanding league in Europe and this equips English sides better for European ties. Continental divisions may share the top places more often, but one off games are tougher affairs in England. I do not think it is up to Pratini and the like to try and dilute the playing field to artificially break up the English dominance, Europe`s behemoths should look more closely at what they can do to bridge the gap with their impressive resources. Whilst I am not against more responsible business models, I find it odd that Madrid, who sold their training ground off to their own council at over twice its recommended value, are apparently victims here and escape Pratini and Bladder`s acid tongues. Far more worrying issues lurk closer to home, with Chelsea, United, Liverpool and ourselves annually permitted to dip our snouts further into the Champions` League trough, is our own competition and its dwindling sense of competition more likely to see England`s decline abroad.LD.




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



For the very latest Premier League odds

Free £15 bet when you spend £5 on The New Football Pools




Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Tim Stillman Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Thursday April 16 2009

Time: 3:34PM

Your Comments

I'm hoping for for a Chelsea x Arsenal final. It would be too painful to lose to united again, and I'm sure it would be too painful for you, to lose to Barcelona again (with thierry henry). A Chelsea x Arsenal final would also mean that one of the virgins finally get to score.
k_chelski
I'm hoping for for a Chelsea x Arsenal final. It would be too painful to lose to united again, and I'm sure it would be too painful for you, to lose to Barcelona again (with thierry henry). A Chelsea x Arsenal final would also mean that one of the virgins finally get to score.
k_chelski
Paradoxically the CL is one of the factors which sustains the big clubs and makes it harder for others to break the status quo because of the additional financial power it gives them. Part of the answer would be to make the competition eligible to league winners only. The problem Uefa has with that is that it means less money for them too.
Amos.
Paradoxically the CL is one of the factors which sustains the big clubs and makes it harder for others to break the status quo because of the additional financial power it gives them. Part of the answer would be to make the competition eligible to league winners only. The problem Uefa has with that is that it means less money for them too.
Amos.
nice article LD, and its something that I too have been thinking for awhile. The continental clubs go through managers so quickly that I can't begin to understand how they think they will ever achieve the stability of the big English clubs (take note sp*rs). And k_chelski, I think most of us want Barcelona...revenge is what I want anyway. Plus we'll play you lot plenty enough in the next few weeks!
TPowell
nice article LD, and its something that I too have been thinking for awhile. The continental clubs go through managers so quickly that I can't begin to understand how they think they will ever achieve the stability of the big English clubs (take note sp*rs). And k_chelski, I think most of us want Barcelona...revenge is what I want anyway. Plus we'll play you lot plenty enough in the next few weeks!
TPowell
Revenge is nice, but what if you lose to them again?
k_chelski
Revenge is nice, but what if you lose to them again?
k_chelski
I agree that they should either make the competition for winners only again. Regardless of that, it should be a straight knock out. The group stages are tedious for everyone and this is when the real drama happens. Would Liverpool and Chelsea have aggregated a score of 7-5 in the group stages? Would they hell as like.
Little Dutch
I agree that they should either make the competition for winners only again. Regardless of that, it should be a straight knock out. The group stages are tedious for everyone and this is when the real drama happens. Would Liverpool and Chelsea have aggregated a score of 7-5 in the group stages? Would they hell as like.
Little Dutch
The English dominance is just a chapter in champions league history. It will end, more patterns will be found, it may resume... As for playing 2 legs, I don't think many like it outside UEFA, TV channels and investors. It's just a money spinner really. Personally, though, I do like playing 2 legs, unless one side is happy to sit on their lead from the first one and just defends. I enjoy the tactical spin it puts on things, and the opportunity to both visit new grounds and host different foreign teams. I'm actually getting rather bored of this English dominance. The CL semi-finals consist of the same teams of the FA Cup semis, just Barcelona have slotted in for Everton, and some of that continental feeling is missing from the competition. We match up with ManU etc at least twice a season anyway, so it's nice to have the opportunity to be tested against some unfamilliar opposition.
ArsenalRob
The English dominance is just a chapter in champions league history. It will end, more patterns will be found, it may resume... As for playing 2 legs, I don't think many like it outside UEFA, TV channels and investors. It's just a money spinner really. Personally, though, I do like playing 2 legs, unless one side is happy to sit on their lead from the first one and just defends. I enjoy the tactical spin it puts on things, and the opportunity to both visit new grounds and host different foreign teams. I'm actually getting rather bored of this English dominance. The CL semi-finals consist of the same teams of the FA Cup semis, just Barcelona have slotted in for Everton, and some of that continental feeling is missing from the competition. We match up with ManU etc at least twice a season anyway, so it's nice to have the opportunity to be tested against some unfamilliar opposition.
ArsenalRob
A fabulous article, well written and thoroughly thought out. Cheers. "Or are Englandís top four clubs simply better managed with better players?" I think that answers all questions, we may dominate the money charts of Europeís wealthiest, but we donít take up EVERY position which means there are team out there who have as much money but cannot break the mould, whose fault and whose problem is that. Not ours I say, the longer the EPL rules the roost the better imho. Stuff the other's this country has worked its nuts off turning the game around, preventing hooliganism (except Cardiff, Leeds and a few motley others), improving stadiums, generating money and increasing the level of quality throughout the game. We have achieved this and not under the doping, corrupt, racist cloud that other countries attempt this. So I say this, bo**ocks to Europe the Premiership rules the waves!!!
LondonGooner
A fabulous article, well written and thoroughly thought out. Cheers. "Or are Englandís top four clubs simply better managed with better players?" I think that answers all questions, we may dominate the money charts of Europeís wealthiest, but we donít take up EVERY position which means there are team out there who have as much money but cannot break the mould, whose fault and whose problem is that. Not ours I say, the longer the EPL rules the roost the better imho. Stuff the other's this country has worked its nuts off turning the game around, preventing hooliganism (except Cardiff, Leeds and a few motley others), improving stadiums, generating money and increasing the level of quality throughout the game. We have achieved this and not under the doping, corrupt, racist cloud that other countries attempt this. So I say this, bo**ocks to Europe the Premiership rules the waves!!!
LondonGooner
It's kind of ironic that these morons are blasting our league for trying to make as much money as possible when they actually restructured the entire European cup for that exact reason. As LG says, there are other very rich clubs out there, and if they don't spend their money properly then that's their problems. While I hate to see Utd, Chelsea and Liverpool do well, it does make me smile to think how these clubs are dominating in Europe and *****ing Blatter and Plattini off at the same time.
Rocky7
It's kind of ironic that these morons are blasting our league for trying to make as much money as possible when they actually restructured the entire European cup for that exact reason. As LG says, there are other very rich clubs out there, and if they don't spend their money properly then that's their problems. While I hate to see Utd, Chelsea and Liverpool do well, it does make me smile to think how these clubs are dominating in Europe and *****ing Blatter and Plattini off at the same time.
Rocky7
And oh how you do like youre little digs at us lol. But Good article - clearly Arsenal have been and are a fantastically run club much better than Spurs, when our reserve side is costing more than your first team something seriously going wrong when you consider we were in a relegation battle a few months back. I do think in terms of finances though Levy aznd co have done a great job. We consistantly turn out a good profit and have a massive amount of turnover more than anyother side in europe who havent or do not play in the CL. First impressions of our plans for our new stadium are brilliant too. Id also like to point out that Gio isnt a "reject" he found it hard like all our players have in a struggling side. Hes on loan at Ipswich which is a fantastic move for the kid theyre a well run club in terms of coaching etc and hel learn his trade there much more than being on our bench. 1 of the main reasons youve managed to build a good team with so little investment is your policy in the carling cup. I hope we start to go down this same route with our youngsters as the first time in ages it appears we have real strength and talent in our youth side.
HuddersfieldYiddo
And oh how you do like youre little digs at us lol. But Good article - clearly Arsenal have been and are a fantastically run club much better than Spurs, when our reserve side is costing more than your first team something seriously going wrong when you consider we were in a relegation battle a few months back. I do think in terms of finances though Levy aznd co have done a great job. We consistantly turn out a good profit and have a massive amount of turnover more than anyother side in europe who havent or do not play in the CL. First impressions of our plans for our new stadium are brilliant too. Id also like to point out that Gio isnt a "reject" he found it hard like all our players have in a struggling side. Hes on loan at Ipswich which is a fantastic move for the kid theyre a well run club in terms of coaching etc and hel learn his trade there much more than being on our bench. 1 of the main reasons youve managed to build a good team with so little investment is your policy in the carling cup. I hope we start to go down this same route with our youngsters as the first time in ages it appears we have real strength and talent in our youth side.
HuddersfieldYiddo
I would love it, if the only English team to reach the semi's was The Arsenal!
hackneyval
I would love it, if the only English team to reach the semi's was The Arsenal!
hackneyval
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Arsenal Articles

Arteta: 'Shocked and Frustrated' (Monday November 24 2014)

The First Goal Matters (Saturday November 22 2014)

Wenger & Ozil Share a Mutual Trust (Wednesday November 19 2014)

Memories: Jens Lehmann (Wednesday November 19 2014)

On Adding The Science To Sanchez Magic (Sunday November 16 2014)

Archived Arsenal Articles

List All Vital Arsenal Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. Amos. 96
2. paul_ownz 49
3. Naijagunner 47
4. Galway Gooner 40
5. Wyn Mills 38
6. shewore 26
7. Joe_@** 21
8. Little Dutch 15
9. damiano_tommassi 13
10. Guyfox 9

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Arsenal 1 - 2 Man Utd
Swansea 2 - 1 Arsenal
Arsenal 3 - 0 Burnley
Sunderland 0 - 2 Arsenal
Arsenal 2 - 2 Hull City
Chelsea 2 - 0 Arsenal

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
5. Newcastle 12 5 4 3 -1 19
6. West Ham 12 5 3 4 4 18
7. Swansea 12 5 3 4 3 18
8. Arsenal 12 4 5 3 5 17
9. Everton 12 4 5 3 3 17
10. Spurs 12 5 2 5 -1 17
11. Stoke 12 4 3 5 -2 15

Breaking League News

Ľ Southampton : 24/11/2014 22:04:00
Ľ Aston Villa : 24/11/2014 21:50:00
Hull 1-2 Tottenham
Ľ Hull City : 24/11/2014 20:58:00
Palace 3-1 Liverpool
Ľ Crystal Palace : 24/11/2014 20:36:00
Liverpool: Rodgers Running Out Of Time
Ľ Liverpool : 24/11/2014 19:00:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

With a stuttering start to the season what league position can we still reasonably aim for?
Suggested By:  
First 4%
Second 12%
Third 16%
Fourth 28%
Fifth or lower 32%
Still too early to bother with predictions 8%