UK time is: 02:57:38
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Sunderland 1 Arsenal 0

Since the fixture list reared its fresh summery face in June, I always had this down as a potential defeat, as borne out by my expressions that a draw would be a good result for much of the last week. Wenger had spoken portentially about injuries at the dawning of the international break and sure enough, players were lost in the line of duty for their countries. Sunderland away after an international break would have been a trifling fixture for any of the top four and, though I was ultimately disappointed at the result, I didn't find it as gut wrenching as the self destructive defeats in Manchester. In fact, I didn't feel there was much informative of the defeat or that it exposed any endemic problems, bar our continued refusal to concentrate at set pieces. This was the first time this season that Arsenal did not register on the scoresheet which is not a problem I see continuing in any serious way.

Arsenal do appear to suffer more greatly than our closer rivals after such breaks. I would suspect largely due to two reasons, one being that we don't hold the same mental fortitude as United and Chelsea. The second possibly being that Wenger is more of an idealist than Ferguson or Chelsea and does not find convenient injuries for his players when international friendlies roll around. (Terry and Lampard both miraculously shook off knocks to start yesterday). The journey was a sleepy one, having been out celebrating the birthday of a couple of friends in Central London until the early hours of Saturday morning, a cold shower and a cup of team were my only respite before leaving a dreary, wind swept London at 5am to join the coach. Arsene left Andrey Arshavin on the bench- doubtless taking into account the disappointment he would have felt with Russia on Wednesday night, whilst Sagna and Gallas did start despite playing extra time in a draining match for France.

But the Gunners started in very spritely fashion indeed and Sunderland looked to be the world weary ones. After just fuve minutes, Arsenal should have ruffled the Wearsiders net, Nasri flipped a pass out to Sagna on the right, his much improved crossing was elucidated with a whipping back post delivery, Fabregas impressively stretched his legs to flick the ball into the path of Rosicky, but he blasted his shot straight at Fulop from ten yards out. Had he placed the ball either side of the Estonian keeper, the away support would have been celebrating rather than grumbling regretfully into ther bovrils. Ten minutes later, the Gunners went close again. Armand Traore had his shot blocked from the corner of the box, the ball fell to Fabregas who smashed a rising first time shot inches over the bar. With van Persie in disposed and Arshavin on the bench, much of the responsibility was on the crown jewels of our little triumvirate.

The home side had looked cumbersome and weary but the home support shamed most of us that spend every other week at the Emirates. They actually encouraged their players vocally and, bingo, it bought a rise out of the Mackems players. Andy Reid jinked past an exhausted looking Sagna down the Sunderland left and hooked over a cross which saw Armand Traore well out of position, leaving Malbranque a free shot on goal, fortunately, he misconnected and lashed wildly over. But the game's finest opportunity to date would come from the cauldron of Arsenal's stand out performer. Alex Song bought the ball forward with purpose and vigour, playing a delicate one two with Eduardo on the edge of the area, before dinking the ball back into Eduardo again, he cut inside Bardsley but dinked his finish narrowly wide of the Sunderland post. It was one of the few occasions Arsenal had looked decisive and assured in the area, Nasri and Rosicky bought back an unwelcome facet that had dogged our play before the signing of Arshavin. We over elaborated in the crucial areas, Nasri and Rosicky were often guilty of taking too many touches or of trying to walk the ball in. Something Arshavin and van Persie had bought to our forward play was an incisiveness in the area, the ability to see a pass or a shot and make it quickly. Rosicky was uncharacteristically, too cute on occasion, whilst Nasri still looks to be playing his way back into match fitness.

The first half petered out, Fabregas hit another shot over the bar, whilst Ramsey's bouncing volley from Traore's cross did not much trouble Fulop. The second half saw Arsenal limbs begin to tire even further. Arshavin was bought on for Ramsey as Arsenal tried to find a creative spark, but a lack of willing runners in behind defenders left Fabregas with too much to do by himself. Despite it having been a bitty match, you felt that one goal would come along. On 71 minutes it did. Andy Reid swung in an excellent delivery, Bent won the first header against Vermaelen, his header hit an unmarked Fraizer Campbell and fell invitingly back into his path and Bent continued his scoring odyssey against the top four with a well taken finish. For Arsenal's part, Sunderland had three unchallenged touches of the ball, eight yards from our goal from a corner when there were nine Arsenal players in the area. I've said in previous weeks that defending isn't always as much about formations as it is a mentality. That Arsenal have let cheap goals slip to set pieces when winning games comfortably informed a malaise that led to Tomas Rosicky standing idly by and watching as Bent ran onto a slowly moving ball in the area. One can't blame having three centre forwards for poor defending when all but one of those centre forwards is back in the area.

With Eduardo proving too stationary to make a difference, Vela was bought on in his palce as Walcott replaced Rosicky. Wenger needed someone to try and push the Sunderland line back and ultimately Walcott managed it- even if he didn't always manage to bring the ball under his spell. Instantly, Fabregas spotted Theo's run and played a ball into him on the right flank, Walcott spun a low cross in but no Arsenal player had taken a chance on getting in the penalty area. (Think of van Persie's two recent goals against Spurs, Walcott's delivery would have supplemented such a run by an Arsenal player). It was again left to Alex Song to provide a much needed creative spark, he showed great fortitude to win a physical battel with Richardson in midfield, cut the ball back onto his left foot and clipped an excellent ball into the onrushing Arshavin, who could only steer the ball a fraction wide. Arsenal were still having trouble though raising the tempo despite the desperation of the situation. Vela threw in another excellent low cross which predictably nobody had bothered to try and run onto. A Fabregas cross was met with a fierce volley from Vermaelen which flew wide. In the sixy seconds previous to that chance, Vermaelen had twice headed the ball down in the box to find nobody trying to get on the end of it, so it's instructive as to why he tried a shot from such an angle.

Arsenal should have had an injury time penalty when Richardson clipped Vela's feet in the area. Wiley eas excellently positioned but waved play on. Vela was again wrestled in the penalty area even further into injury time but again Wiley turned down Arsenal appeals. It's no coincidence that Arsenal have not had a penalty since Eduardo's tumble against Celtic. That's one of the prices we will have to pay for that situation and I remarked at the time that that would be Eduardo's and our ultimate punishment. The final whistle sealed our misery. It was clear that we lacked sharpness in the final third following an international break. Sunderland have beaten Liverpool and came incredibly close to winning at Old Trafford this season, so it was not the massive surprise Radio Five Live seemed to think it was as we boarded the coach home. A draw would have been a fairer result, but in Darren Bent, Sunderland have an incredibly clinical finisher. Bent took his only chance, Eduardo missed his by inches. Such are the breaks sometimes in football. We had the players to cause Sunderland problems even without van Persie (lest we forget that Kenwyne Jones was also in a watching brief yesterday, as was half of Sunderland's first choice back four). It really means we have to beat Chelsea next week to stay in touch at the top, but further refusal to concentrate at the back will be punished ruthlessly. The team have bounced back from their set backs so far this season, let's hope they have the fortitude to do so again.LD.

Team: 1.ALMUNIA, 3.SAGNA, 10.GALLAS, 5.VERMAELEN, 30.TRAORE, 17.SONG, 4.FABREGAS(c), 16.RAMSEY (23.Arshavin '56), 8.NASRI, 7.ROSICKY (14.Walcott '71), 9.EDUARDO (12.Vela '71). Unused: 15.Denilson, 18.Silvestre, 24.Mannone, 27.Eboue.

Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!

Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Tim Stillman Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Sunday November 22 2009

Time: 2:43PM

Your Comments

Good report, I was disappointed by Eduardo's movement and finishing, he still seems to lack sharpness. Also I'm pretty sure Lampard didn't play at all for Chelsea yesterday.
I also had a feeling we'd slip up here. A pity, as I really felt this could have been our season with the others not looking invincible. Wenger seemed very downbeat in his interview, almost as though he doesn't believe that we can win the PL anymore. That was very telling. The players must now give a reaction.
Lampard definitely did not start yesterday. But he's gone to that Serbian Placenta witch doctor, so he'll be fine. So, are your wheels coming off with the RvP, Gibbs, Clichy injuries? Just a friendly question, no need to take offence.
we have to be fair to Eduardo - Van Persie admitted himself that it took him some weeks to adjust to this role. and while i hope it doesn't take eduardo as much time, we cannot expect him to just seamlessly fit into the role. Our problem was simple none of our attacking players seemed to be on song yesterday.
Gooner_Vin You mention wenger seems down ,he probably is, you have some reasonably hard games ahead of you and without von p its quite tough for you ,mind you we have been down 3 of our best players and were right next to you so lets see how deep your squad is.
Good point about Nasri and Rosicky over-elaborating. This has been an annoying facet of Arsenal play for the last few seasons, and it's a direct result of Wenger playing attacking midfielders in the wing positions. Not just Nasri and Rosicky but previously Diaby and Hleb as well. With Walcott and Arshavin we have the pace to blow past the fullbacks and stretch defences, and we really need a player of that type on at least one of the wings. One of Nasri/Rosicky is ok in our front 3, but both together just doesn't work.
I was actually surprised at Rosicky because he's not usually like that, he's usually very direct and decisive and this would have to be one of his most insipid Arsenal performances I've seen. Wenger said in his post match comments that some players didn't perform as he'd expected and I'd wager Rosicky and Eduardo were uppermost in his thoughts when he said that. DBerg, you're right in a sense and that's a fear I touched upon when I heard about RvP's injury, Sunderland away and then Chelsea are hardly the sort of games you want to be blending in a new attacking solution. But it doesn't bode well for Eduardo that the manager took him off for Vela when we were 1-0 down with 20 minutes to go, particularly when the manager bemoaned our refusal to try and go in behind the defenders and "play it easy" as he put it. One thing Walcott gave us immediately was a willing runner, his ball control wasn't always spot on and one or two of his crosses were wayward, but he gave Sunderland something to think about and affected the game in his 19 minutes on the pitch more than the starting front three put together.
Little Dutch
This game could of had any outcome. So few chances through out the whole game. The difference between us and Man united 0r Chelsea is that they would of won the game even playing below average.
in contrast, spurs had a pretty good weekend . u guys should maybe try shooting some times and not just doing pretty passing triangles
wow what a weekend
place is like a morgue
We haven't done too badly on the shooting front pachnaspud. We have still averaged more goals per game at home than you have - and away too for that matter. Even with the weekends results your goal difference is still lagging way behind us.
Did you want us to throw a party for spurs thrashing a poor team? Even Portsmouth put 4 past them. I dont want to ruin your day out in the sun, but lets not start making DVD's quite yet.
DVD? You must be kidding? This has to be worth a box set, nine part series perhaps?
Little Dutch
The sales of that series alone could buy another 10 million pound flop.
Honestly, Ive never seen a more obsessed set of fans in my life. Coming to the game - I was surprised Walcott did not start given he was available. I think we will see Theo starting from now on. He gives us a bit of width and more importantly pace. We've come back from setbacks earlier - lets do it again.
yeah i see what ya mean about us buying flops. defoe, crouch, krancjar,palacios, there badly underperforming .lol
u guys shud av started with arshavin and walcott
I must admit, it was a bit of surprise, outcome of the game that is.
I must admit, it was a bit of surprise, outcome of the game that is.
Ooops, sorry about double post.
a poor team that beat chelsea , villa an only team to beat burnley away, paul again shows how much brains cells hes using not many, dont be jealous cause so called best footballing team(arse) cud not even come close, how does it feel to be missing an important player, thought edwardo was ready, id have bent any day
It was magnanimous of Wenger to congratulate the spuds. We're still waiting for 'arry to congratulate us on our 3-0 stroll against his spuds a couple of weeks back but I guess that wasn't so unexpected.
dont change the suject amos
Methinks it's you trying to change the subject 123spud - and who could blame you.
you got 9 but not a good goal amongst them.
wenger hopefully will be equally magnanimous when he is cleaning out his desk at le arse.
Does anything you say ever make any sense at all uscock? And when it comes to cleaning out desks spuds managers are in a league all of their own.
They also lost to wolves at home you mug, does that make them a good team? They lost 4-0 to bottom side Portsmouth, does that make them a good team? They lost 4-1 to blackpool in the carling cup, won only 2 out of 6 games at home, only portsmouth have lost more games, conceeded 4+ goals 5 times this season already. So yes i would class them as a poor side. But please, by all means consider it the best victory of your life.
So, the spuds have succesfully forgotten the 0-1 Burnley match?
if arsenal manage to win 9-1, they all be talking how great they are playin the great footbal the way it shud be, now we have done it an they knock us sayin a poor team blah blah blah, sour grapes, an iceman not a good goal, an maybe if got rid of yer whinger we might get close to winning something been a while, yer CC team are more successful then the first team
You're being a bit dumb 123spud. It was you yourself that posted the link to Wenger congratulating you on your scoreline so no point criticising our attitude - not when you knock our trophy success when you haved failed to get a sniff of a title in almost half a century. Now just go and buy your commemorative dvd, matching duvet and lampshade and be content with what you have.
It was a great attacking performance played in the right way, but against a poor team. Like when we beat Middlesborough 7-0, spartak 7-0 or Liverpool won 8-0 against Besiktas. Great attacking displays against poor sides.
You see 123 spud me saying there wasnt a good goal was a p**s take out of your thieving manager because even after our captain ran from the half way line beating 3 of ur Zombie like players thats what Redknapp said, Sour grapes?
"yer CC team are more successful then the first team." You could say the same about Totnum.........
Little Dutch
except there's no difference between the two
Patresc Vieiragas

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Arsenal Articles

Arsenal Games Switched For TV (Friday December 19 2014)

Bellerin To Play With More Freedom Now (Friday December 19 2014)

Wenger - Monaco Completes The Circle (Friday December 19 2014)

Liverpool v Arsenal Match Preview (Friday December 19 2014)

The Ox: Don't Blame Wenger, Blame Us (Thursday December 18 2014)

Ozil Slightly Ahead Of Schedule (Thursday December 18 2014)

Archived Arsenal Articles

List All Vital Arsenal Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. Amos. 64
2. Naijagunner 47
3. paul_ownz 25
4. Galway Gooner 22
5. Little Dutch 12
6. shewore 12
7. luckys_10 11
8. Nwankwo25 11
9. alwaysgunner 10
10. Wyn Mills 10

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Arsenal 4 - 1 Newcastle
Stoke 3 - 2 Arsenal
Arsenal 1 - 0 Southampton
WBA 0 - 1 Arsenal
Arsenal 1 - 2 Man Utd
Swansea 2 - 1 Arsenal

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
3. Man Utd 16 9 4 3 12 31
4. West Ham 16 8 4 4 8 28
5. Southampton 16 8 2 6 12 26
6. Arsenal 16 7 5 4 9 26
7. Spurs 16 7 3 6 -2 24
8. Newcastle 16 6 5 5 -4 23
9. Swansea 16 6 4 6 2 22

Breaking League News

Team News: City v Crystal Palace
Man City : 19/12/2014 19:57:00
Pellegrini Confident Milner Will Stay
Man City : 19/12/2014 19:54:00
Team News: Hull v Swansea
Hull City : 19/12/2014 19:37:00
Dawson Out For Five-Weeks
Hull City : 19/12/2014 19:36:00
More Than Arfa Chance Hatem Will Leave
Hull City : 19/12/2014 19:35:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Wenger's sure Henry will return - in what role?
Suggested By:  Site Staff
Coach 67%
Manager 33%
Director 0%
Like Wenger, not sure but know he will return.... 0%