Vital Football

Latest Arsenal FC News

Gutless FA Are Part Of The Problem

Gutless FA Are Part Of The Problem

The FA clearly haven't learnt a single thing from Aaron Ramsey's career threatening injury. Not one single god damn thing.

A couple of hours before the Stoke City vs Arsenal game kicked off, two people were removed from a football match because of one solitary tackle committed by one player.

During the the PL clash between Birmingham and Wigan, Brum's resident dirty bloke, Liam Ridgewell made a tackle on Wigan's James McCarthy, that was equal to, if not worse than the tackle that broke Aaron Ramsey's leg. It was a miracle that the Latics player did not suffer a similar fate to our own Rambo.

The flying lunge down by the corner flag was made with such force that it took out the player (making sure he suffered a recurrence of his ankle injury) and also sent said corner flag careering into the face of the linesman, cutting his head. The linesman had to be replaced by fourth official Steve Bennet.

Today the FA revealed they planned to take no further action against Liam Ridgewell because 'the referee saw the incident at the time and dealt with the situation at the time.'

Could there be any possibility that the referee was wrong? Maybe he didn't have a good angle? Because from the footage and the replays shown on Match of the day, I am 100% positively sure that the tackle was vicious, reckless and very worthy of a red card.

The gutless turds at Soho Square consistently hide behind the rule (the rule they created) that if the referee saw the incident and acted on what they saw, then no further action can be taken.

Here's and idea ...... CHANGE THE FUCKING RULE BEFORE SOMEONE GETS HURT.

Oh ..... wait .......



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer:Rocky7
Date:Tuesday March 2 2010
Time: 5:46PM

Comments

0
Its a rule that makes no sense anyway. You cant act on an incident the referee has seen because apparently that would essentially mean you were re-refereeing the game. Yet surely, acting on something the referee hasnt seen is still re-refereeing the game? Whats the difference? You either let a match play out and accept everything that happens or you do the sensible thing - admit that a referee cannot see everything, admit that a referee cannot get every decision correct and therefore take action when its appropriate.
tuscan3000
02/03/2010 17:58:00
0
They don't have to change the rule. They have already set a precedent to deal with it in the case of the Ben Thatcher assault on Pedro Mendes a while back. They just have to have the will to deal with it.
Amos.
02/03/2010 17:59:00
0
They had no problem subverting that rule for Ben Thatcher ater his forearm smash on Pedro Mendes. (Thatcher was booked but still awarded a six match ban). But of course, that was because the media told them to. Not a watertight rule by any means, just another excuse from the most work shy bunch of freeloaders since the Royal Family.
Little Dutch
02/03/2010 17:59:00
0
2nd time in 2 days you beat me to it Amos! Damn you!
Little Dutch
02/03/2010 18:00:00
0
How ironic - as I type there is an advert for the HSE right above the league table on this site that simply says "Simple mistakes can shatter lives. Your actions could stop them happening."
Rocky7
02/03/2010 18:02:00
0
yeah, it's a stupid rule... and the slippery slope argument is a dumb one as well... "well if we do this, then won't this happen, and so on, and so on..." do what you need to do... it's pretty ridiculous that arsenal has had TWO identical injuries in the span of two? years... something must be done...
woodysweats
02/03/2010 18:36:00
0
Whilst I agree that bad challenges must be clamped down on, particularly those with malicious intent, I must point out the huge amount of trouble we would be in if the FA or some other body had free reign to 'adjust' refereeing decisions after the match.

The point about that Ben Thatcher/Pedro Mendes incident is that the FA finally took action against Thatcher because of the huge media storm that was whipped up about it - they lamely bowed to public pressure instead of sticking to their laws, even if their laws happened to be wrong. Several other dirty challenges that happened during the time between Thatcher/Mendes' actual incident and the time Thatcher was handed his sentence went completely ignored by the media and subsequently the FA, because they had a fish to fry.

Yes, the current law of not wanting to re-referee the game is bizarre and does allow for these sorts of situations to arise, but you can only really have a situation of 'all or nothing' when it comes to changing the ref's calls after the match - either every mistake, however trivial, should be reviewed or none of them should - if you start trying just to deal with the really shocking ones, like your kid Ramsey or McCarthy, then soon every manager who disagrees with a decision against his team, particularly if he believes it cost them the game will have a go - with good cause - about getting the decision 'reviewed'.

I'm in favour of seeing thugs punished as much as the next man, but you have to be so careful before you call for things like this.
Naoise
02/03/2010 19:22:00
0
Agree with Naoise. I think both players involved in the Ramsey challenge were unlucky (obviously Ramsey is a LOT worse off), but the challenge was not that bad - yes he's suffered a horrific injury that can happen with a mistimed challenge, and Shawcross' was not a wild lunge that was miles away from the ball. The interesting thing is that we do see these wild lunges aimed at taking the player down all the time - at spurs for example Gareth Bale gets chopped down at least twice a game when the ball is miles gone (and obviously this happens to Arsenal players all the time too). These are what need to be punished harshly, (including Defoe's wild lunge the other day I might add). Mistimed challenges like Shawcross' less so. In other words Ridgewell deserves the punishment that Shawcross has got.
Joshtottenham
02/03/2010 19:41:00
0
The rule where you cant re punish someone if the ref casted a judgement on it - is appauling.
HuddersfieldYiddo
02/03/2010 20:09:00
0
If someone gets brought down because of a mistimed challenge that has to be different from someone that is tackled "carelessly, recklessly and/or with excessive force". Apply that Law of the Game to Ridgewell as it should be (and ultimately was to Shawcross) and it becomes a lot simpler to distinguish those tackles. It's subjective but not really so hard to see the difference between the Ridgewell tackle and a mistimed one.
Amos.
02/03/2010 20:16:00
Page 1/2
  1. 1
  2. 2

Login to post a comment

Best of Vital Network

Vital Boxing - Ingle Talks Brook

Recent Arsenal Articles

Welbeck Gunning For FA Cup Glory

Winning the title, finishing top-four at least, and a Champions League run is the first aim. But, as the FA Cup is special, ex-Manchester United forward Welbeck's up for Chelsea.

Arsenal Announce FA Cup Screening Cancelation

Arsenal's planned screening of the FA Cup final against Chelsea at the Emirates is off as heightened security, following the Manchester attacks, has forced a re-think.

Mertesacker - I'll Be Ready For Chelsea

Per Mertesacker is set to follow up his 150th appearance for Arsenal against Everton with a place in Arsene Wenger's starting XI against Chelsea in Saturday's FA Cup final.

Wenger - FA Cup Final Not About Me

Arsene Wenger has said he doesn't know if he'll remain at Arsenal beyond the FA Cup final with Chelsea but insists Saturday's game is about more than him anyway.

Archived Vital Arsenal Articles

Vital Arsenal articles from

Site Journalists

Write for Vital Arsenal
Write For Vital Arsenal
Apply Here

Current Poll (see more polls)

FA Cup Final - Arsenal v Chelsea
Suggested By:
Arsenal win50%
Chelsea win50%
ScoopDragon Premier League Network Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
C Chelsea 38 30 3 5 93 52
2 Spurs 38 26 8 4 86 60
3 Man City 38 23 9 6 78 41
4 Liverpool 38 22 10 6 76 36
5 Arsenal 38 23 6 9 75 33
6 Man Utd 38 18 15 5 69 25
7 Everton 38 17 10 11 61 18
8 Southampton 38 12 10 16 46 -7
9 AFC Bournemouth 38 12 10 16 46 -12
10 WBA 38 12 9 17 45 -8
11 West Ham 38 12 9 17 45 -17
12 Leicester City 38 12 8 18 44 -15
13 Stoke 38 11 11 16 44 -15
14 Crystal Palace 38 12 5 21 41 -13
15 Swansea 38 12 5 21 41 -25
16 Burnley 38 11 7 20 40 -16
17 Watford 38 11 7 20 40 -28
R Hull City 38 9 7 22 34 -43
R Middlesbrough 38 5 13 20 28 -26
R Sunderland 38 6 6 26 24 -40
Write for Vital Football
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News
The Vital Football Members League

Recent Arsenal Results (view all)

Arsenal Fixtures (view all)

May 27 2017 5:30PM : Chelsea (H)
FA Cup

Vital Members League Table

RankNamePoints
1.Naijagunner1
Vital Football Comment