Vital Football

Latest Arsenal FC News

Jeepers, Keepers

Jeepers, Keepers

With the acquisition of a new goalkeeper looking very unlikely, Arsenal are going to have to go the tried and tested route in between the sticks on Sunday. Nobody seems too sure who Arsenal`s current first choice goalkeeper is at the moment, indeed, we could see any one of our four first team goalies manning the posts at Anfield. I`m sure the manager is trying to promote competition by keeping his cards close to his chest; but I am not entirely sure that that is such a healthy situation for the fragile confidence of some of our custodians nor for the defence selected to play in front of them. The mystery box goalie didn`t work out too well for Capello and Rob Green this summer as I recall. Either that or the manager genuinely expected to have bought someone in by now to be bona fide first choice. Anyway, that certainly won`t happen in time for Sunday, so who should play?

The case for: Sufficiently dry behind the ears, at 33 Almunia is our most experienced option, he has played and played well at Anfield before and he is the most familiar option with the defence. Almunia doesn`t make as many catastrophic errors as people make out; he`s had three seasons as our number 1 and has heard every criticism going. They say good judgement comes from experience, experience comes from bad judgement and Almunia has a plentiful enough history of both by now. Arsenal fans explicitly refuse to point out his good points as a keeper, but he does have them. He almost never fumbles crosses (though his propensity to punch unnecessarily is annoying) and his record with penalties is better than David Seaman`s. Our other three options are youthful wild cards; all three are probably just as likely to lose us the game as win it. We know what we`re getting with Almunia and he is the safest option we have.

The case against: The dislike of Almunia; from supporters and the media, has reached hysterical proportions and his reputation is unlikely to ever be viewed positively in North London again. The pressure on him will be intense, the concession of any sort of goal will be forensically analysed and construed as his fault, whether that be the case or not. Almunia`s confidence is unlikely to be high, he has been only a sporadic presence in pre season and the manager has hardly been at hand with ringing endorsement. His assertion in May that "I never said Almunia was my long term number 1" combined with yet another "illness" enforced absence for the remaining league fixtures of last year point to the fact that Almunia does not have a future at the club. The persistent chase for the distinctly average Schwarzer won`t have bridged any rifts in that regard.

The case for: There is an outstanding goalkeeper in there somewhere, elastic limbed and agile; he is still capable of pulling off the sort of saves I don`t think other Arsenal keepers are. Arsenal are away from home to a rival and will inevitably spend time on the back foot, Fabianski is a positive goalkeeper who sweeps up well around his area. The manager clearly still has faith in him despite his mistakes last season. Most of those errors came in inconsequential games and the experience should stand him in good stead. Having appeared in most of our pre season games, he should be more finely tuned than our other choices. The game is also away from home, away from the jeering stupidity of the people who are supposed to support the club. On the Members Day there was an audible ironic jeer when Bob Wilson announced an on pitch competition where supporters were invited to compare their reflexes with Fabianski. A solid performance at Anfield could restore is reputation and unleash the talented goalkeeper lying somewhere amidst the wreckage of last spring.

The case against: His confidence appears to be absolutely shot to bits, in his last five or sic games he has made at least one glaring error. The rigours of a pre season friendly in his native Warsaw seemed too much for his fragile nerves and it`s a massive risk to have such an accident prone goalkeeper for our opening game. Whereas a good performance could help partially restore his reputation, another mistake will surely finish him off on these shores. Liverpool v Arsenal is a huge game in the fixture calendar which attracts a global audience; eyes will be boring into the back of his skull, willing him to commit another error straight from the comedy reel. He could recover from his errors in the manner that Huerelho Gomes did, but I think it more likely he will go the way of Alex Manninger as a talent buried under the glare of a suspicious public. Fabianski cannot have the confidence of his defence; he certainly does not have the confidence of the supporters. There is a fine line between a manager showing faith and a manager showing blind faith.

The case for: Having been out of the team for the last ten months, everyone has pretty much forgotten how many errors he made when he was first in the team! The spell in between sticks last season will have been a valuable learning curve for him and the performance at Craven Cottage seems to have glossed over the general anxiety he showed for every other game for which he was in goal. The credit he has locked in the bank would mean he would probably be the least harshly scrutinised of the four possible choices and therefore most likely the most relaxed. He has had a good number of minutes in pre season, saving a penalty and generally doing all that has been asked of him. The performance at Fulham last year suggests he has it in him to be a match winner.

The case against: He hardly convinced in his spell in the first team last season; his judgement is still rather erratic and the defence didn`t display a lot of confidence in him. He was quietly dropped again after a poor performance at Upton Park. Saving penalties against Austrian part timers in pre season is one thing, but Anfield roaring on a new manager with Gerrard and Torres firing bullets at you is another kettle of fish altogether. The last ditch saves at Craven Cottage masked some positional mistakes one would come to expect from a keeper with less than 20 professional appearances behind him. As well as being incredibly inexperienced, I`m not even sure I see a great deal of potential in him.

The case for: A supremely confident young man with a point to prove. Confidence is an alien trait to Arsenal keepers just now. Szczesny still has praise ringing in his ears from a prosperous loan spell at Brentford and has earned the peculiar distinction of a big reputation amongst supporters having only played for the first team once. Szczesny is whispered to be the great white hope of Arsenal`s goalkeeping future and the reason the manager is only looking for a stop gap in the shape of Schwarzer. The manager has never been afraid to throw in young players with the requisite quality in the past, so it stands to reason he wouldn`t hesitate to hurl a talented 20 year old keeper into the deep end. Szczesny also shows signs of being a commanding, dominant presence unperturbed by making use of his larynx. He is the only option that has a genuinely clean slate in terms of form and confidence of supporters. There may be an element of mistrust between the defence and Mannone; Fabianski and Almunia, but Wojciech is an unknown enough quantity to build trust with the back four without any previous looming overhead.

The case against: His reputation as our goalkeeping saviour mystifies me; he has played one game for us at home to a Championship side. He may have impressed at Brentford, but if I told you we`d just signed MK Dons first choice goalie and that we were going to start with him on Sunday, what would your reaction be? Even if the keeper in question was only 20. Szczesny benefits from the fact that he is simply a.nother other than Almunia or Fabianski. In the few times I have seen him he has shown undeniable quality, but those include a reserve game and Brentford playing at Millwall. Does he yet have the authority to command a defence that has designs on winning the title? In reality, Szczesny probably needs another loan spell, possibly at a Championship/ lower reaches of the Premiership level before he can have designs on the coveted number 1 shirt. Considering his confirmed squad number for the year is again 53, I very much doubt the manager considers him ready yet.

The verdict: Given what we have, I think it`s a no brainer. It has to be Almunia. He may not be the greatest (by no means the worst either) but he`s the best we`ve got. He is well acquainted with occasions such as this and, contrary to popular belief, performs more often than he doesn`t. I`m not going to tell you I think Almunia to be anything other than the fifth or sixth best keeper in the league, but that puts him comfortably above our other options; who are either an accident waiting to happen or too callow. Arsenal seem to like destroying the confidence of young goalkeepers in the last ten years, perhaps we could wait a little while yet before we leave Mannone or Szczesny as gibbering wrecks. Fabianski simply cannot play as it seems at the moment he is making one glaring error in every game; Almunia`s errors are usually a) less glaring and b) more sporadic. In the absence of a new, top class goalie (and Schwarzer would satisfy only one of those qualifiers), I think Almunia has to be the man. What would you do?LD.

Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer:Tim Stillman
Date:Thursday August 12 2010
Time: 2:21PM


I agree. Almunia ought to start purely because of his experience and the fact that like it or not, he is probably best equipped to deal with these types of matches. Almunia by some distance should start IMO. He is not as error prone as Fabianski and his confidence is probably a lot better though not great either.
12/08/2010 14:31:00
Hand on heart LD, I really didn't expect to be going into the opening fixture of the 2010/11 season still having to choose between Almunia or Fabianski. It seems as though AW has buried his head in the sand over this GK issue. You are right, Szczesny does need a loan spell at a good Championship side, or preferably a PL side, within reason. Unfortunately my choice at Anfield goes to Almunia, but only because he makes fewer mistakes than Fabianski. I think you HAVE to agree with me that at this stage, it's a ridiculous position to be in, and one that we never expected.
Cockney Rich
12/08/2010 14:50:00
At the end of the film jeepers creepers the monster rips out a young fellas eyes. I would rather play the eyeless kid than Fabianski.
12/08/2010 14:54:00
It's got to be Almunia. Ok he is prone to the occasional error, but he doesn't look half as bad as Flappyanski. Big Fat Sam exposed the easiest way to exploit Lukas and it's very effective. Almunia can handle that side of the game much much better and is just as good a shot stopper.
12/08/2010 14:57:00
It's a shame because I really saw something in Fabianski, I can see why AW went for him at a young age. But it's going to be one hell of a struggle for him to recover now. I do agree that I fully expected the position to be sorted by now; even if we get Schwarzer it's not an improvement. I have to say I now fully buy into the theory that AW has a real blind spot for keepers. Perhaps he could still call on someone like Seaman or Wilson to help him out because his record in that area is poor.
Little Dutch
12/08/2010 14:59:00
I was undecided about Mannone, even after his ' match winning ' performance at Fulham. However, my mind was made up during the home game with Blackburn.
Cockney Rich
12/08/2010 15:14:00
I agree about Fabianski LD, I thought he was going to be the next big thing. I do think Schwarzer would be a slight improvement, if only a very small one. But at this stage even a small improvement would be welcome.
12/08/2010 15:18:00
Crazy that it hasn't been sorted out by now, Almunia has to start, but Hodgson is a versatile manager who can get his teams to adjust for a range of challenges, the whole world now knows about our lack of confidence at the back, I expect lots of crosses and shots on sight from Liverpool. What is the point in Wenger working hard on our passing game only for all that work to be undone by a cheap goal, he is defeating himself here and then by default the team.
Professor Calculus
12/08/2010 15:24:00
I can see us going through a depressing cycle. Almunia plays at Anfield and is at fault for a goal. He makes another howler against Blackpool and suffers a mysterious injury. Fabianski appears at Blackburn and is a bag of nerves making some shocking mistakes. Almunia is back against Bolton but has a bad game. Fabianski's turn now at Sunderland.........and so on and so forth.
Cockney Rich
12/08/2010 15:35:00
IMO Fabianski is far too much of a liability to trust in a game of this importance and magnitude. How many chances is AW going to continue to give this guy?
12/08/2010 15:50:00
Page 1/3
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

Login to post a comment

Best of International Football News


Recent Arsenal Articles

Mkhitaryan In As Alexis Saga Ends

Arsenal have tonight confirmed that Henrikh Mkhitaryan has signed on the line at Arsenal with Alexis Sanchez going in the opposite direction to Manchester United.

Premier League Tops European Attendance Charts

Last week UEFA published their Club Licensing Benchmarking Report and one of the telling conclusions from the study was that the English Championship...

Instant Reactions - Arsenal v Crystal Palace (20/1/18)

Following today's clash between Arsenal and Crystal Palace, here are the instant reactions from both managers.

Stats: Arsenal v Crystal Palace

All the stats from Arsenal (4) vs (1) Crystal Palace, Emirates Stadium, 20/1/18 Att: 59,386

Arsenal Archived Articles

Vital Arsenal articles from

Site Journalists

Highbury Gooner
Editor email

Current Poll (see more polls)

Palace MotM
Suggested By: Site Staff
Sub - Maitland-Niles0%
Sub - Nelson7%
Sub - Kolasinac7%
ScoopDragon Premier League Network Sites
Vital Football Comment
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News
Write for Vital Football

Recent Arsenal Results (view all)

Arsenal Fixtures

The Vital Football Members League