Vital Football

Latest Arsenal FC News

1919 and All That

1919 and All That

It`s a story that has had football`s historians speculating and researching for generations, it has provided claims and counter claims. It`s a story of dusty old boardrooms, political glad-handing and whispers behind palms. It is also a tale that has fiercely divided the Northern point of England`s capital city for close to a century and cemented one of professional football`s most keenly felt rivalries. It is not by virtue of geography alone that one Kent based and one Middlesex based football club came to despise one another. This is the story of how Arsenal were promoted to England`s top flight in 1919- a position they have never relinquished.

Following the conclusion of the Great War in 1918, the Football League decided to expand the First and Second Divisions (there was no Third Division until 1958) from 20 clubs a piece to 22. The proposal was unanimously supported by clubs who wanted more fixtures as more fixtures created greater revenue. Always a desirable outcome (see friendlies, international for modern day proof), but particularly as football clubs had been deprived any sort of income whilst competitive matches were suspended between 1915-18. However, the Football League and its participating members realised this would be an arduous process. New clubs always had to be voted in by secret ballot of all league members and the last time the league had been expanded in 1905, there broke out heated negotiations. The Football League had originally been the sole preserve of Northern and Midlands sides until Woolwich Arsenal belligerently broke in in 1894.

But traditionally, the more Northern sides had block voted to keep London and Southern sides out of the division. To illustrate this point, Tottenham won the Southern League and the F.A. Cup in 1901, but still could not surmount the democratic process and become elected as a professional league club. So an uneasy kind of "hot peace" had co existed either side of the Midlands divide in the early part of the century. League expansion would inevitably lead to more political bun fighting and a reigniting of old grudges. Football League expansion had always been a matter of secret ballot vote in football`s early years, though league position was seen as a big part in that process. A club`s potential to be an attractive enterprise for the league obviously was largely contingent on how good they were. But other factors came into play- something Arsenal Chairman Henry Norris knew all too well.

In the last season of League Football prior to the First World War, Tottenham Hotspur had finished bottom of the First Division, whilst Chelsea finished second bottom- putting them both in the relegation spots. Meanwhile, Derby County and Preston North End had occupied the top two slots in the Second Division. On the face of it, with their greater presence for a blocking vote, one would have expected the Northern majority to have simply voted Derby and Preston into the Division and would have been happy for Spurs and Chelsea to disappear. Tottenham and Chelsea however, argued fiercely for their interests. For instance, Tottenham insisted that the ballot should be an open one, an unprecedented step for the Football League at the time. (Of course nobody else agreed to this, so it didn`t happen).

However, Chelsea alleged that Manchester United and Liverpool had been involved in match fixing. United finished one point ahead of Chelsea in the relegation places and a scandal was uncovered that United had bribed Liverpool to lose a crucial end of season encounter to them to ensure their safety from relegation. The practise of match fixing was widespread in these times and the Football League were well aware of it. But they fretted that if such allegations were to be made public, it would hurt the commercial viability of the sport. Chelsea ventured that both Liverpool and Manchester United be thrown out of the league. Arsenal chairman Norris- whose side had finished 6th in the Second Division, chimed in with his concurrence. Clearly, this was not a proposal that Liverpool, Manchester United or the Football League would entertain for their own reasons. It looked as though Civil War was on the cards, with the Southern and Midlands sides breaking away from the Football League. This proposal was much more dangerous to the Football League than it was when Arsenal first floated the idea in 1893, as the Southern League had become much more prosperous.

To hush the various warring factions, the League offered a compromise by rearranging promotion for two clubs for Division 1 and three for Division 2. (Glossop North End had opted out of the league, hence the extra spot). Chelsea were quietly re-elected to Division 1 as an acknowledgment that they had suffered from bribery and corruption. Tottenham were not re elected as the fixed match had no bearing on their survival. Derby County and Preston North End were elected unanimously. However, Norris was not satisfied with this arrangement, offering, not unreasonably, that the league was condoning bribery and corruption by refusing to punish Liverpool and Manchester United. As a Member of Parliament, a Freemason and a Knight of the realm, Norris threatened to use his significant political power to force action against the Football League and expose their shenanigans. Norris motioned that Tottenham, Liverpool, Chelsea and Manchester United all be kicked out of the First Division. Though the facade was noble on Norris` part, self interest was at heart. He had ploughed £175,000 of his own money into building Highbury and he knew Arsenal needed to be in the top flight lest that investment become folly.

The exact details of the lobbying and negotiations are in the grave with the perpetrators, but a fair amount of circumstantial evidence suggests that Liverpool Chairman and Football League board member John McKenna- naturally a good friend of the well connected Norris- looked to do a deal to get Arsenal voted into the Football League so long as they dropped their threat to make the match fixing public. Though it`s fair to say Norris wouldn`t have looked a gift horse in the mouth, the truth is, his skills of persuasion were legion anyway. In the arena of lobbying for votes, Norris wiped the floor with Tottenham- who were rather unpopular with the other member clubs anyway. (When Arsenal had proposed a breakaway Southern League in 1893, Tottenham only gained one vote to enter the division. Their own).

Whilst Spurs complained about the voting process, Norris got to work, pointing out the huge potential fan base Arsenal had due to their location close to the West End. This would have had League Chairmen`s ears glowing in an age where gate receipts for all league fixtures were split 50-50. Norris also whispered honeyed words to other club`s directors about the favourable option of a weekend in Central London as opposed to the outposts of Birmingham and Wolverhampton. He also mentioned Arsenal`s length of service and loyalty to the league at every opportunity (even though Wolverhampton Wanderers had been in the Football League longer than Arsenal). Norris also convinced Chelsea Chairman Claude Kirby that their place in the league would be safeguarded anyway, thereby securing Chelsea`s vote. In his autobiography, Arsenal manager at the time Leslie Knighton opined, "Norris corresponded with a few financiers here and there."

With his hands doubtless red roar from handshakes and back slapping, Norris saw the vote emanate massively in his favour- with Arsenal securing 18 votes to Tottenham`s 8. Barnsley received 5 votes, Wolves 4, Nottingham Forest 3, Birmingham City 2 and Hull City 1. Arsenal were elected to the Football League having finished 6th in Division 2 (the position was revised to 5th some years later after an error in the goal average calculation had been uncovered). Tottenham were relegated to Division 2. Tottenham have never forgiven Norris or Arsenal, firstly for muscling in on their patch in North London, then for taking what they felt was rightfully their place in the top flight of English football. That Arsenal have never since been relegated from that position both ferments Tottenham`s anger further and proves that Norris was correct to place so much gravitas on promotion to maximise the club`s potential. Spurs have cried foul ever since, but the reality is that this is how all promotions were decided at this time, by electioneering. Tottenham themselves were elected to the Football League for the first time in 1908 having finished 8th in the Southern League the previous season. But 1919 has left a sourness in Tottenham`s disposition towards us that has lasted close to a century and shows little sign of ever abating. Allegations of bribery persist, but the only corruption that has ever been uncovered lays at the door of Liverpool and Manchester United.LD.

Follow me on twitter @LittleDutchVA

With thanks to Tony Attwood and Brian Belton.

Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer:Tim Stillman
Date:Friday April 22 2011
Time: 6:38PM


1st post.. !!
Block D Spurs
22/04/2011 18:46:00
Good history story, I wonder what mr norris would say, seeing the way your board directors and shareholders are working together now !
Block D Spurs
22/04/2011 18:51:00
Considering we're widely considered to be the best run club in England, he'd probably be quite content.
Little Dutch
22/04/2011 18:59:00
Hmm.. lets see what happens as to how / who is the owner of your club this year.. Anyway spurs are also a well run club, and just need the financial support Arsenal received in their new stadium and we will be close, very close....
Block D Spurs
22/04/2011 19:12:00
History hasn't changed has it? Spurs sit around complaining about getting a rough deal, Arsenal get up and get on with it.
Little Dutch
22/04/2011 19:15:00
Thing is Block d, that extra financial support you 'just need' that we've benefitted from since the move to the Grove is how close to fruition? Yep lightyears. You've repeatedly had stadium plans turned down by Haringey Council as shoddy and underthought architecturally suspect bobbins, you've lost the olympic stadium bid and are about to throw more good money after bad in a court case that will alienate you even further with the olympic committee. So what now? You're stuck in a dilapidated shack in a proper hole with cruddy transport links, but every week that passes sees us pull in an extra third attendance wise, which given that we pull in £3m with every home fixture is over a million quid (rough I know as our ticket prices vary) better off with every home game that passes. You can say the gap is closing and the last few fixtures is the closest you have been in a generation, but as I said on the other thread failure to qualify again for the CL will see a wholesale shipjumping from your squad, then having to go back to playing europah fixtures. i think deep down you all knew this which is why you were so determined to make the most of it and enjoy yourselves after the 5-0 agg hammering by Real as it could be the last time for sp*rs for another generation.
22/04/2011 19:44:00
Like LD said in the post before mine which also sums up perfectly the two clubs' attempts to upgrade stadiums. Sp*rs method is a farcical comedy of ongoing errors, rubbing everybody up the wrong way at every turn, running one way then the other then back again like Huddlestone with a steak dangled in front of him, whilst we quietly got on with building a magnificent 60,000 seater in the heart of London in what seemed like a few months. Now you don't see it ...Now you do. Magic.
22/04/2011 19:52:00
The only magic is that you did not suffer the financial downturn the worst since wwII.. that we are going through, and Islington Council are not the same idiots as in Harringey...and Tony Blair was a resident in Islington and so helped you out with Planning approval govt. grants of £m's etc
Block D Spurs
22/04/2011 20:51:00
We did suffer the downturn, the property slump hit us with the Highbury development, but a contingency plan was in place to deal with worst case scenarios so as not to affect anything re the stadium loan or any other finances to do with the clubs daily running. Arsenal have enjoyed a decent relationship with Iz council over the years but like anything it has to be worked at. It's a two way street, as the article mentions gladhanding and politicking the likes of which Norris and Dein excelled at are a quality Levy obviously just doesn't have in his armoury. Lammy is a massive spud yet you seemed to have alienated him and burned bridges with all this olympic fiasco and doubtless others in Haringey council have had their patience exhausted when the plans you have submitted have just not been realistic in regards to listed buildings, local business and the community at large. It has been a constant saga of working against and in spite of instead of with the council.
22/04/2011 21:05:00
23/04/2011 05:46:00
Page 1/2
  1. 1
  2. 2

Login to post a comment

Best of International Football News


Recent Arsenal Articles

Arsenal - The United Nations Club Of English Football?

Mkhitaryan signing adds Armenia to Arsenal`s State of Origin List

Mkhitaryan Takes No 7 But Not For Europe

Arsenal have confirmed that new signing Henrikh Mkhitaryan will take Alexis Sanchez's vacated number 7 shirt, but regulations stop him from wearing that number in the Europa League.

Vital Football Backs The Pride Of Britain Winner Appeal

Vital Football backing the Pride of Britain winner Moin's appeal. Please help.

Arsenal Duo In Team Of The Week (23/1/18)

Arsenal are represented in the latest Premier League team of the week that has been selected by BBC pundit Garth Crooks.

Arsenal Archived Articles

Vital Arsenal articles from

Site Journalists

Highbury Gooner
Editor email

Current Poll (see more polls)

Palace MotM
Suggested By: Site Staff
Sub - Maitland-Niles1%
Sub - Nelson3%
Sub - Kolasinac3%
ScoopDragon Premier League Network Sites
Vital Football Comment
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News
Write for Vital Football

Recent Arsenal Results (view all)

Arsenal Fixtures

The Vital Football Members League