UK time is: 08:29:58
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

To Henry Or Not To Henry?

Arsene is nothing of not an incalcitrant old cad when it comes to the subject of transfers. Tight lipped coyness is ordinarily the order of the day when taken to task over the items on his shopping list. But occasionally, just occasionally, Mr. Wenger gets all Pavlovian on our arses and watches us all salivate with a suggestive ring of the bell. In the last 24 hours, let`s just say he hasn`t exactly quashed growing rumours linking us with a romantic swoop for former beau of the North Bank Thierry Henry.

Henry of course has been training with us in the MLS off season to keep his ageing limbs tuned to the highest pitch. This set tongues a flutter as the ladies and gents of Fleet Street made a tenuous link to a loan deal; given Arsenal`s dearth of any competent back up to Robin van Persie. In his press conference yesterday, the manager admitted he would consider a loan move for Arsenal`s record goalscorer, with Gervinho and Marouane Chamakh moseying off to the African Nations in January.

But is it a good idea? Would a 6 week signing at the expense of 70,000 a week represent value? Would this be a canny addition to the squad? I have to say I don`t think so at all. I appreciate it is difficult to put sentiment aside for one of the club`s most loved servants. Sentiment amongst football fans is not at all wrong and in many ways it keeps us coming back to a game increasingly sullied by filthy lucre. Sentiment can be lovely. But it doesn`t kick footballs and it doesn`t win football games and qualify you for the Champions League.

If sentiment had any genuine governance over football; John Terry wouldn`t have won multiple trophies, Bergkamp would not have been forced to sit out the 98 FA Cup Final and Arsenal would have won the league in honour of Eduardo and / or Aaron Ramsey. But football is like life. It`s not governed by some mystic force. It`s random and often cruel as a result. So one has to cast sentiment aside here, it has no gravity within the situation other than in the more whimsical recesses of our minds.

To proffer a Wengerism, the decision to sign would have to make sense "footballistically." Let me put this to you, let`s say Henry had never played for Arsenal with such distinction. Arsenal need a striker. Arsene puts down a 70k a week offer for a 34 year old striker from the MLS. For six weeks. Are you honestly telling me people would be satisfied with that? Henry operates at the same level in the same league as Robbie Keane currently does, but most Arsenal fans wouldn`t have him cleaning our bogs, let alone sitting on our bench.

Raul, Shevchenko and van Nistelrooy are around the same age as Thierry and operating at a higher level, why not the clamour for them to step in? Footbalistically, it would make as much sense. Salary is an issue too. 70,000 a week is no cheap gamble. Many ask, "Why not give it a whirl, what`s the worst that could happen?" You may argue that for a period of six weeks it would represent a drop in the ocean. But Henry would need to really produce the goods to justify that outlay and represent value. I mean, relatively speaking, 5 isn`t a lot of money, but I wouldn`t spend that much on a chocolate bar.

This isn`t even about "protecting Henry`s legacy" or anything that grandiose. That`s an off the pitch consideration, one for photo shoots and montages. On the pitch, it`s irrelevant. The interests of the team are paramount and the interest of the team decrees that we need a quality striker. Competitive sport`s over riding Darwinism overrides any affair of the heart. The Thierry Henry Legend DVD is always on the shelf for any intravenous nostalgia shot. It`s tempting to make comparisons with the return of Sol Campbell, or the job Henrik Larsson performed for Manchester United for half a season at the age of 36. The problem is, comparisons are equally useless. They don`t really scan in this scenario because, well, you know, people are different. We turned Lauren from an all action central midfielder into a right back. By that token, we should do the same with Aaron Ramsey, right?

Like I said, human beings aren`t prototypes, what scans for one man in his mid 30s doesn`t necessarily translate to another. Henry has been playing virtually part time for two years and has just been on holiday to boot. How long would it take him to get up to speed, assuming he were even capable at this stage? As much as people protest to the contrary, the very probable reality is that he isn`t at the standard that Chamakh is, otherwise he`d play in a more challenging league.

In any case, it`s not my view that we just need a striker for six weeks. Ju Young Park is already 25% of the way through his stint with Arsenal and Chamakh`s form has been in the khazi for over a year. Van Persie`s contract remains unsigned. I`d far rather see us invest in a long term option that can provide competition upfront and be relied upon.

As I said at the outset, I fully understand the misty eyed outlook of football supporters. We`re all of us soft, weepy creatures, or else the club wouldn`t bother with the Lux Aeterna backed montage prior to kickoff at the Grove. Our heartstrings love a good old tug. But the game is based on the green spaces of reality and they dictate that it is unlikely that any 34 year old playing MLS would struggle to impact the Premier League again. Arguments that "he knows the club" are strawman and don`t have any footing in reality. Besides which, since his transfer, only one player remains and the club isn`t even owned by the same people.

Memories are great, but they are designed to fade, so they can be replaced by newer experiences. The club crest has the word "Forward" stitched into it this season and I remain unconvinced the resigning of King Henry would stay true to that maxim. I guess Arsene is in the best place to make this call having seen him train for the last few weeks, but it would be a move I would have serious doubts about. Have a very Merry Christmas if indeed it is your custom to celebrate. LD.

Follow me on twitter @LittleDutchVA




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Tim Stillman Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Saturday December 24 2011

Time: 2:44PM

Your Comments

henry training with us should be great. theo can move to the middle & we can unleash chamberlain. get gotze or hazard
Joe_@**
Footballisitically? Whatever the merits of signing Henry or not, I'm certainly loving the coining of that term! happy Christmas Gooners.
fifthcolumnblue
Never go back,
Tiny T
I'll go for "protecting Henry's legacy" as good enough reason to jettison the idea. It is a romantic thought but Arsene will have to be pragmatic on this one. He is an astute Manager and I believe he will pass on this one.
Naijagunner
A lot of fans will rather remember the legend that is Thierry Henry; a less than inspiring performance in any game and there will be a few fans who will question the very idea of a short term signing. Of course, in hindsight. Preserving his status (and statue) is important, please.
Naijagunner
I'd leave that decision to Wenger. He got it right when Sol & Jens came back for short stints and he was able to gauge that correctly. He did not give Pires a similar chance and he got that also right, judging by his stint at Villa. I think Henry is good choice, he is smart enough to know that he is not at the same level and will only play a bit part with Arsenal. He will not steal RvP's thunder (both on the pitch and in the dressing room). He might still be good enough for substitute appearances (Park might start games in January, and Henry might come for him, after 70 mins).
prits
Live in ny and watch nyrb whenever a chance arises. I'm afraid he is past it.
Sajit
Think of the distraction this may cause the team owing to the 'circus' atmosphere such a signing will create at this time. It is the Manager's decision, true, but it isn't as if he hasn't gotten some wrong before.
Naijagunner
I'd rather have a 50 year old Henry in my team than Chamakh and Arshavin at the moment. . . . .
gunnerpig
Tend to agree LD like an ex champion boxer coming back into the ring. Nevertheless, gates would go back to being full the marketing gang would have a field day. The boss generally always picks the best bet and I for one would stand back and pray. But i also agree I would rather have him in the team than Arshavin. Really hope he picks another striker to back RVP; thought any idea who you would pick for us to go for??
alwaysgunner
The choice is either to buy a young, promising and quick striker on a permanent transfer in the next 2-3 weeks or to get Henry back for 2 months. If its difficult to prise a good striker away from their club in January as it would be, calling on Henry wouldnt be the worst option. Henry though not as quick as before still has immense creative skill and some of his through balls for his team mates in the last year have been superb. He still has a ridiculously good first touch, great off the ball movement, good dribbling ability and a brilliant shot from distance. I think comparing TH to the one dimensional Keane is a disservice to Thierry! All said though, I have a hunch AW will try and prise Solomon Kalou from Chelsea.
Deltaforce
It all depends on what is available. We need a striker and if there isn't a long term choice out there then Henry is ideal. He's still going to score goals, and as long as Robin stays fit his football would be minimal. Look at it this way ... it's 2-2 with ten minutes to go, we can either bring on Chamakh or Thierry Henry .... I know which I would prefer. But if we can bring in a quality young singing then that should be the priority.
Rocky7
Drogba. Not Henry.
Tony Rocky Horror
Agree with both delta and rocky, apart from Kalou. I dont see Kalou as a long term quality addition, I have seen enough of him over the past few seasons to come to that conclusion, a good squad player yes but we need more then that to take the baton when rvp is rested or.......(not saying that word), or we might as well keep chamakh. I for one think Henry is a better option then kalou, and as Delta says he pretty much still has everything apart from a yard of pace. Bergkamp was never the quickest, even in his prime, but he made up for it with his deft touch and having the footballing brain of Einstein!....I would put Henry in that bracket. And lets be honest, a 34 year old Henry has more vision in his little finger then either Arshavin or Chamakh do right now. With regards to his "legacy" So what if he has a few ***** games for us over a few weeks! What he has done for this club will surely outweigh a few dodgy games? Its a no brainer for me and a risk I would be willing to take. Its 1-1 with 80 mins on the clock, I dont think ANY defender would relish even a 34 year old titi running at them with 10 mins to go, Just having him on the touchline warming up would give the whole stadium and team a lift. Let me put it to you like this (for all the non believers) How would you feel if another prem team beat us to it, and nabbed him for a few weeks? That's how I came to my conclusion.......we have nothing to lose (apart from a few quid). Yes a QUALITY long term striker we definitely need, but I think we need to use our peripheral here instead of tunnel vision.
gunnerman76
I think what most of us want to see more than anything is some decisiveness from Wenger. If he want to take Henry for a few months, great. If he signs Demba Ba, Brilliant! If he signs some young some young dude I've never heard of but is full of confidence after scoring 70 goals in the Fijian league...ok.
No 10
To be honest I think I'd be alright if he said he was going to give Theo his chance through the middle and give the Ox a chance on the wing. I think Alex's directness may benefit Theo as a striker to be honest.
No 10
The supportive comments I'm seeing all deal in intangibles and fantasies. "Imagine the lift he'll give the place," "he'll be good in the dressing room," "he's better than Chamakh or Arshavin." Firstly, giving a lift to the place would a) peter out after a game or two when he's clearly not up to it- think when Liverpool resigned Robbie Fowler. b) For the first time in years, we actually have experience and spirit in the dressing room. c) The truth is, he probably isn't better than Chamakh or Arshavin now. If we were to sell either of the aforementioned, I bet they'd still be bought by a club at a higher level than Henry is currently playing. If Henry had turned into this Bergkamp style figure in his play, why isn't he playing at a higher level? If I put any other 34 year old MLS striker to you as a solution, not one, not a single one of you would be happy. That's the reality. Sentiment doesn;t alter that.
Little Dutch
gunnerman76, you almost got me sold with "How would you feel if another prem team beat us to it,...". But I thought Nah! Too sentimental for me.
Naijagunner
Kalou will also travel to the ANC - cant see Wenger bidding for him this window, not with Gervinho and Chamakh also going.
prits
Agreed Prits, Kalou is not an option.
Deltaforce
at least until the MLS restarts, this seems a no brainer, whilst you are without the likes of Gervinho for the ACN. Henry knows the players and club and offers only a short term solution which seems to be your best option unless you are looking to spend big next month
oxfordspur
Henry actually only ever played with van Persie out of the current squad. The club also has different owners since he left. He knows the manager and that's probably the biggest thing, I'd agree, but the players and the club aren't the same as Henry knew when he was here.
Little Dutch
LD, Henry will be back up to Chamakh once he is gone to the ANC. As an option off the bench, I'm ok with that. In this time, if Park can step up, perhaps Wenger will reduce his use of Henry. It does look like Wenger does not want to sign another striker. If that is the case, then Henry is a good option and I can see the logic. I'm not bringing his legacy bit into the argument, as I agree that it's irrelevant.
prits
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Arsenal Articles

Ozil Slightly Ahead Of Schedule (Thursday December 18 2014)

Henry Destined For Arsenal Return (Wednesday December 17 2014)

Polish Wonderkid? (Wednesday December 17 2014)

Henry Outlines His Arsenal Management Dream (Wednesday December 17 2014)

Gilberto Offered Coaching Role? (Tuesday December 16 2014)

Giroud - Don't Take Monaco Lightly (Tuesday December 16 2014)

Thierry Henry Retires From Football (Tuesday December 16 2014)

Santi Delivers His Own Presents (Monday December 15 2014)

Archived Arsenal Articles

List All Vital Arsenal Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. Amos. 56
2. Naijagunner 44
3. Galway Gooner 22
4. paul_ownz 22
5. Little Dutch 12
6. luckys_10 11
7. Nwankwo25 11
8. alwaysgunner 10
9. Wyn Mills 10
10. shewore 9

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Arsenal 4 - 1 Newcastle
Stoke 3 - 2 Arsenal
Arsenal 1 - 0 Southampton
WBA 0 - 1 Arsenal
Arsenal 1 - 2 Man Utd
Swansea 2 - 1 Arsenal

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
3. Man Utd 16 9 4 3 12 31
4. West Ham 16 8 4 4 8 28
5. Southampton 16 8 2 6 12 26
6. Arsenal 16 7 5 4 9 26
7. Spurs 16 7 3 6 -2 24
8. Newcastle 16 6 5 5 -4 23
9. Swansea 16 6 4 6 2 22

Breaking League News

AVB Moaning
Spurs : 18/12/2014 08:25:00
Ozil Slightly Ahead Of Schedule
Arsenal : 18/12/2014 08:16:00
Those Ashley Cole Rumours - An Update!
Chelsea : 18/12/2014 07:45:00
Chelsea`s Hazard Close to Signing New Deal!
Chelsea : 18/12/2014 07:39:00
Slow, Slow and Slower!
Chelsea : 18/12/2014 07:33:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Wenger's sure Henry will return - in what role?
Suggested By:  Site Staff
Coach 100%
Manager 0%
Director 0%
Like Wenger, not sure but know he will return.... 0%