UK time is: 20:49:14
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Kallstrom Suffers Back Injury In First Session

Reports appear to be breaking out of Sweden that Arsenal new boy, Kin Kallstrom has injured himself in his first training session and will be out for three months.

I`m not quite sure why this story would have to come from Sweden and not from the UK, or whether or not it`s a wind up, but it seems as though the story is picking up pace.

More as soon as we have it.

Update: The BBC's David Ornstein says Kallstrom is out with a back injury and the reports of him being out for 2-3 months are inaccurate.

Updated update: Arsenal confirm the injury but say it isn't serious, though Kallstrom will not be in the squad for tomorrow. I susspect he wouldn't have been eligible anyway.

Updated Updated Update: The Mirror claim the injury did not happen in training, infact Kallstrom arrived with the injury but Wenger decided to sign him on loan anyway.

Join The Vital Debate

Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!

Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Rocky7 Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Saturday February 1 2014

Time: 2:55PM

Your Comments

Ironic if it's true but he'd have been a benchwarmer anyway.
It's not nice to laugh at an injured player, but the thought of thousands of Gooner brains exploding at this news is making me chuckle.
He's not going to play more than a handful of league games and maybe one or two in the cup. No big deal but a shame for him. Heating its short-term.
Galway Gooner
It would have been worse if we'd signed Messi and he was out for the rest of the season!!! Didn't Campbell suffer something similar, though not too critical, after he'd rejoined?
You know this is going to blown out of all proportion, but it's only news because it's kinda funny. If he'd have been injured next week nobody would have paid a blind bit of noticed, but it's just because it's his first day.
The speed with which information travels these days! Or is it the rubber-necking interest in all things Arsenal? No wonder some fans are losing it. From all accounts this is not a signing for the masses. As unfortunate as an injury is a a mass hysteria would even be more than unfortunate.
Nothing yet on the official site but, I guess you can't miss what you didn't really "have". We might as well assume the status quo, especially as he wasn't going to be a sure starter with our key men fit. Rather unfortunate, if true.
Safe to say that the word 'medical' regarding arsenal new signings has nothing to do with checking a player's fitness and susceptibility to injuries. I believe we may cancel the loan if its really 3months he'll be out for. I do think its true, same was said of ramseys injury until wenger had no choice but to confirm the lengthy lay off. Judging by sanogo's 6 months and counting... Back injury, the future looks bleak for the chap.
Completely bizarre signing, so many baffling transfers have happened at the club the last few years
Someone Wenger wanted to sign five years ago and obviously hasnt got out of his system. We need a striker, we get a crocked midfielder. Makes perfect laughable sense.
Wyn Mills
I'm not sure there has been "that" many odd signings SW, but Park & Kallstrom are among the oddest signings I have have ever seen, especially when you consider Kallstrom arrived injured.
Most clubs have made some pretty bizarre transfers, kind of goes with the territory, but Kallstrom is only a loan deal for a few months. Hardly qualifies as the oddest of signings. Same with Park really. Was a gamble that didn't pay off but cost very little.
Amos, It could cost us big time. With respect, I think you;re trying to paint a rosy picture. We're heading into a period that, to quote the BFG "could make or break" the team. And we're heading into that period shorn of our first choice midfielders and without the back-up striker to Giroud that every man and his dog can see we should have. Wenger likes a gamble, and that's been half the problem for many past seasons. Too many of these gambles haven't paid off. It appears the club signed Kallstrom knowing he couldn't play for the next six crucial games. In Arsenal speak that means he won't be available until the end of March, by which time You'd expect both Ramsey and Flamini to be back. What is the point having players sitting on the bench or in a treatment room? Why sign a player who has an obvious injury, especially a back injury for goodness sake? We talk about rotation at our club, but its all so much lip service. Truth is, we play players until they break down.
Wyn Mills
and please do not come back with "but we have Bendtner".
Wyn Mills
Why am I any more likely to be painting a rosy picture than you're to be painting a black picture? Kallstrom was never a key signing and may well be useful over the last couple of months of the season but equally like Mart Poom may not feature at all -whether he's fit or not. If he doesn't we haven't lost much. Some gambles pay off and cost us little others like Arshavin fail and cost us a lot - but they're all gambles to some extent. Of course it would be good to have a better back up striker to Giroud - but it would be even better to have a better striker than Giroud and let him be the better back up. But, unsurprisingly, the available choices aren't that great. In the meantime we do have Bendtner and Poldolski and maybe Sanogo if he's ever fit. Whatever we achieve this season was always going to be dependent on the players we started the season with and our ability to field our first picks as often as we could. This constant whinging about missed opportunities that never really existed is becoming a bit repetitive.
Ah! Wynn Mills did warn you about the Bendtner quip. Hahaha! But, I am with Amos there. Not too many good strikers were available this window to make the addition very necessary.
In any case' the thing with such loan deals is we do have the option to return the player to his parent club. If we went ahead to take the player on loan, after being aware of his injury, that does look like Wenger signed him to satisfy the restless natives, no?
Kallstrom is slightly different from the 'holding' midfielders we currently have. Mainly playing longer passes more accurately in the style of Xabi Alonso or Gerrard than either Arteta or Flamini. I don't think Wenger would ever make a signing simply to satisfy the natives even if they are restless. There's always a method even if it doesn't satisfy the purpose.
Yes, you did it. You came back with Bendtner. Its always the same excuse. "Not many good strikers available". How many times over the years have we heard that one? Yes, its getting repetitive, which is why It doesn't particular irk anymore. Its not whingeing to point out an obvious problem we may have going into the next half of this season. The opportunity to win real silverware is there, but I guess it will probably be missed, like all the others that 'don't really exist'. As for Kallstrom being signed to appease the natives...well that one went well didn't it?
Wyn Mills
We must surely be running out of couches in the treatment room.
Wyn Mills
Bendtner isn't an opinion he is a fact. We do have Bendtner. Whether there is anyone better than Bendtner available to us is a matter of opinion. Maybe the reason that you have heard that 'not many strikers are available' so often over the years is because there are not many strikers available to us better than the ones we have already. The fact that better strikers exist doesn't mean they're available to us. The opportunity to win silverware is available to us but there's no real certainty that that opportunity is increased at all simply by signing another player. As for Kallstrom being signed to appease the natives - he wasn't.
Amos, much as I agree with you about good strikers not being available in January, I have to agree with wyn that arsene didn't try hard enough for strikers. He put in a very late loan bid for lazio striker klose who is much better than both bendtner and giroud in the area of finishing. Lazio may have let us have him on loan for a fee if we had bid earlier in the window. We were rebuffed because they had just sold hernanes, klose's strike partner on the last day of the window.
Kallstrom was a rainy day buy for the worst case scenario of us needing numbers just like the viviano loan deal. No need to knock his transfer.
What makes you think an earlier loan bid for Klose stood anymore chance than a late bid? They would just have held out to see how much of a loan fee we would have been prepared to go to. And why would we bid earlier for Klose on loan if we had someone else in mind? It would only make sense as an end of the window deal.
Interesting to hear that Moscow are paying KK's wages while he is injured.
Obviously, we must have had a discussion about returning him. Makes you wonder how much they want him around.
Amos, a loan fee of 2- 3 million pounds is not excessive for a world class proven goal scorer if you really mean to strengthen our team on the short-term basis. It doesn't have to be drawn out. Ozil's transfer wasn't drawn out. contact was made, a fee was agreed, player signed, deal announcement delayed for maximum impact. By your logic why didn't real hold off till the last day for a bigger fee?
Real held off long enough for a pretty big fee for Ozil (contact with Real had mean made a few weeks before anything happened) and we only signed him on the final day. I'm not sure where you think the logic fails. 2 or 3m is quite a lot just as a loan fee forgetting the wages for a 35 year old player who is only a back up for 3 months or so but that's what we reportedly offered at the end of the window so why would they have accepted it at the beginning of the window?
The point is it all feels like short term planning and hoping for the best. Even the Ozil transfer had a large element of fortune to it. The next few weeks, as the cliche goes, may well define our season. I feel we could and should have been better prepared. Conversely one cant argue with the results and we seem to be making the best of things. Giroud seems to have hit a wall to me. I wonder where our goals will come from in a really tight game against top quality opposition.
Wyn Mills
The only fortunate thing about the Ozil deal was that we had the money to take advantage of an opportunity when it came. I'm not sure where the idea that Arsenal are guilty of short term planning and hoping for the best comes from. Most of the time they are accused of not thinking enough of the short term and focussing too much on long term development. As Wenger yesterday - get it wrong and it could cost us for 3 or 4 years - he's clearly not thinking short term. If the opposition can also wonder where our goals might come from that should suit us nicely as at the moment they can come from a few places.
Don't you need some good fortune in every player deal? We have seen the clubs with bottomless resources steal in to take players other clubs had started courting, with too much publicity. Mata, Willian, Salah, etc. are examples and, coincidentally, all went to Chelsea who caused their sellers to gazump some other club to sign them. I think you need good fortune to keep such clubs away from an agreed deal, amongst others.
It's one thing to plan for long term changes to infrastructure. Something else to plan for short term shifts in personnel and resources. Arguably the Difference between a director and manager. Good or bad Wenger happens to be both. As for the wrong deal costing the club over 3 years, surely Wenger has more belief in his own abilities than that? Or is he just laying the trail for his exit strategy?
Wyn Mills
Of course he has belief in his own abilities which is why he isn't spending for the sake of it. While others are urging him to give Schalke what they ask for Draxler he's making a value judgement. Even so, every now and then you can get taken in by an Arshavin or Reyes (or Shevchenko, Torres, Veron, Carroll, Robinho et al). Wenger's strategy has been as consistent as it has been because he does look long term. Even Ozil, as expensive as he was, will still have a residual value when his contract enters an unprotected period.

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Arsenal Articles

Arsenal Games Switched For TV (Friday December 19 2014)

Bellerin To Play With More Freedom Now (Friday December 19 2014)

Wenger - Monaco Completes The Circle (Friday December 19 2014)

Liverpool v Arsenal Match Preview (Friday December 19 2014)

The Ox: Don't Blame Wenger, Blame Us (Thursday December 18 2014)

Ozil Slightly Ahead Of Schedule (Thursday December 18 2014)

Archived Arsenal Articles

List All Vital Arsenal Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. Amos. 64
2. Naijagunner 47
3. paul_ownz 25
4. Galway Gooner 22
5. Little Dutch 12
6. shewore 12
7. luckys_10 11
8. Nwankwo25 11
9. alwaysgunner 10
10. Wyn Mills 10

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Arsenal 4 - 1 Newcastle
Stoke 3 - 2 Arsenal
Arsenal 1 - 0 Southampton
WBA 0 - 1 Arsenal
Arsenal 1 - 2 Man Utd
Swansea 2 - 1 Arsenal

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
4. West Ham 17 9 4 4 10 31
5. Southampton 17 9 2 6 15 29
6. Spurs 17 8 3 6 -1 27
7. Arsenal 16 7 5 4 9 26
8. Swansea 17 7 4 6 3 25
9. Newcastle 16 6 5 5 -4 23
10. Everton 17 5 6 6 0 21

Breaking League News

Irvine - Penalty Call Changed The Game
WBA : 20/12/2014 20:44:00
Pelle - Praise To The Whole Team
Southampton : 20/12/2014 20:35:00
Unbelievable Spirit Delights Koeman
Southampton : 20/12/2014 20:28:00
Pearson Continues To Believe Despite West Ham Loss
Leicester City : 20/12/2014 19:58:00
Warnock - We Just Needed The Goal
Crystal Palace : 20/12/2014 19:47:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Liverpool v Arsenal
Suggested By:  Site Staff
Arsenal win 0%
Draw 0%
Liverpool win 0%