UK time is: 13:12:15
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

More Than Just a Pretty Face?

Goals win games so it`s natural that those who play in the positions most likely to score these goals get the most attention, the most adoration and of course the most criticism. Our own man up front creates a lot of debate amongst us Gooners, some feeling he is second rate while others feel he is simply underappreciated. So just how good, or bad is Oliver Giroud and is he really the man that will lead our charge towards the league title?

Comparison wise I don`t think you can really compare him to the likes of Suarez, Augero or even Van Persie mainly because they are very different types of players to Giroud. Yes they are main strikers, and you could argue are all better options than Giroud but they play very different roles in the team to our handsome Frenchman. The fact is that Giroud will never be as prolific as these players as firstly he doesn`t play in a system where he is the main man when it comes to scoring. And secondly, and I say this with the greatest of respect to Oliver, he is simply not as good as they are. He will never be as skilful as RVP, as lethal as Augero or as quick as Suarez but that doesn`t make him a bad striker.

In order to be fair to Giroud I think that we should compare like for like, both in roles that they play and how the teams that they play for are setup. Both Henry and Linekar were both great strikers but had very different skill sets so to directly compare one to the other would be unfair. Looking at the other teams in the league I think that the closest to Giroud are Benteke, Lukaku and Lambert. All are traditional target men who spend a lot of the game playing with their back to the opposition goal and work hard at bringing their team mates into play rather than worrying solely about scoring. It`s an odd thing to have a conversation about a striker when goal scoring is not their strongest point but with the now popular 4-3-3 formation more and more teams are employing their main striker with a view to offering something more than the traditional.

Physical size wise all 4 of our selection are big, Lambert at 6ft 2in is the smallest of the bunch and he gives up an inch to Lukaku and Benteke and 2 inches to Giroud. Weight wise Lukaku at 100kg (that`s 15 and a half stone!) is the real heavyweight of the bunch leaving Giroud in his wake at 88kg. While far from a lightweight Lambert comes in at only 78kg which is just 13 stone and relatively light for a lone front man. Drogba, possibly the best exponent of the lone front man is around 88kg and about 6 ft 2 inc. It`s obvious that in order to play the role they are being asked to play you have to have physical strength and height which all four players have. Robin van Persie, of the other top strikers out there, comes closest in terms of size and while he has the height he would perhaps be a bit too light to play the single forward role the way the other four do.

 photo Chart1_zps79c094c9.jpg

Performance wise I think we`ll look at goals scored (naturally), assists, goal/assist per game ratio and percentage involvement in overall team goals. Time wise I`m going to focus on last season and this season so far which gives us a decent sample size. In order to really compare like with like I`m only going to look at Premier League games.

Looking at last season first they all played quite a lot of football considering how much of a battering that they take. Lambert played in all 38 games, Lukaku in 35 and Benteke and Giroud both in 34. Goals wise Benteke got 19, Lukaku 17, Lambert 15 and Giroud got just 11. None of the four were particularly creative with Giroud on 3 and compared to 4 assists for each of the other three. So looking at goals & assists per game Benteke was at 0.67 (as in each game he played he contributed a 0.67 of a goal or assist), Lukaku was 0.6, Lambert 0.5 and Giroud bottom at 0.41. Put into perspective last season top scorer Van Persie, would score a 0.95 using the same measurement. Finally looking at how much they were all involved in their respective team`s overall league goals produces some interesting numbers with Benteke scoring or assisting in a whopping 49% of Villa`s league goals last season, Lukaku with 43%, Lambert with 39% and Giroud at only 19%. Now you can look at this metric and say that too high a number is bad in that the team relies on you too much and while an injury to Benteke last season for Villa would obviously have been a disaster I do think that you would expect your main striker to be involved in more than a fifth of the team goals. What`s the perfect number? I`ve no idea.

 photo Chart2_zps16f27799.jpg

Overall while Giroud`s scores aren`t terrible he did lag behind the other three in the numbers that mattered but this season has brought a marked improvement. His goal/assist ratio has risen to 0.61 (from 0.41), his involvement in overall team goals has gone from 19% to 34% and with 10 goals and 6 assists so far this season he has already surpassed his combined tally from last season (10 goals and 3). Carrying on at the current rate we can expect him to add about another 6 or so goals and maybe 3 or so more assists which would give him a respectable 16 goals and 10. Respectable but far from frightening.

Lambert`s goal/assist per game has stayed pretty much the same at 0.52. Benteke`s form has been pretty poor and it shows as he drops from 0.67 to 0.42 while Lukaku has improved (possibly from playing in a better team?) from 0.6 to a very impressive 0.7. Interestingly all four strikers are involved in between 30%-38% of their teams goals, Lukaku leading the way at 38% and Lambert at the back with 30%.

 photo Chart3_zps0344a63c.jpg

So what does that tell us about our man? Well first of all it tells us that his contribution is improving. He is scoring and assisting more and is involved in more of our league goals. After a solid, if unspectacular first season, he seems to have settled down and now has the confidence of his team mates and importantly has more confidence himself. Is there more improvement to come? Well I`m not so sure, I think that there`s a bit but not sure of how much. If you were given these stats without any names and asked to pick the best striker I think that Lukaku would come out as a clear winner. Taking the players ages into account you would think that Lambert is likely to go down while both Benteke and Lukaku are young enough to expect some serious improvement. Giroud is 27 and while that it not over the hill by any means he is not likely to get any faster and I think that the one thing stopping him from comfortably breaking the 20 goal a season league barrier is his lack of pace. Lukaku and Benteke are both faster and you do wonder how much they would benefit from playing in a better side? Lukaku has already improved moving from WBA to Everton, could he make the same step up going from Everton to us?

Now I fully appreciate what Giroud brings to the team. His work rate is exceptional and that fact that he gets injured so little is incredible when you consider the battering his body takes. And you can`t measure the sense of team spirit and morale that he brings to the squad but, (and this is where all the "you just hate Giroud" guys can start bashing me) I do think that there are better strikers out there. There are far more lethal finishers who may not suit our current setup (Suarez) but you could also argue that there are also better strikers (in Lukaku for example) out there suited to playing the lone front man role.

The big unknown here is how much more is to come from Giroud? Has he reached his peak or is there another 10% or 15% improvement to be had? His second season at a club has always been a marked improvement on his first which would suggest that he needs time to settle but the problem is that he`s never stayed more than two seasons at a club to judge. He`s still young enough to improve some aspects of his game but unfortunately for him and us, he is unlikely to get any quicker which is the one big drawback for me. Our team is setup such that it requires all our forward playing midfielders to contribute almost double figures in goals and Giroud provides a vital role in that he not only provides direct assists but also drags and batters defenders all over the place for the full 90 minutes. It`s no surprise that we score more in the second half of games and Giroud is key to that with the work he puts in. I suppose the question really is; is hard work, dedication and effort enough to cancel out that lack of pace and the less than 100% finishing rate? And the answer, honestly I don`t know. But if you come back to me at the end of March I`ll have a much clearer picture.




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Galway Gooner Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Tuesday February 4 2014

Time: 2:10PM

Your Comments

Need to resize the 2nd two graphics. I shall be as quick as possible.
Rocky7
Ta da!!
Rocky7
I like Giroud, he's doing alright, he's certainly a lot better than some other options we've had there in the last few years sans Van Persie! I think most peoples' worries are what we don't have up there, i.e. when (and it is when!) he gets injured, and you know it'll happen in the run in...
shewore
Giroud is the cornerstone of our attacks with his physical presence. There is no replacement for him as Bendtner is still not match-sharp, plus Poldolski does not Giroud's physical presence in the box. A mobile Bendtner, totally match-fit, will be a decent back-up for Giroud. But he can't regain his match-sharpness without playing time. "Chicken and egg" situation for Nik. Pray that Giroud remains healthy in 2014.
Merlion96
Giroud, in my mind, is the best player in the PL with his back to goal. He brings other players into the game so well and his first touch is massively improved.
Rocky7
I really like aspects of Giroud's play and I don't want this piece to come across as me knocking the man! He is a very good team player for us and win us a lot of games.

However, my concern is in the really tight games when we may have to work really hard for 90 minutes to create just one clear cut chance is he the type of player that will put this chance away?

With the season looking like its going to be very close how we do against City and Chelsea could well make or brake our title charge and I'm not 100% confident in Giroud in these games. We will see.....

Galway Gooner
Is he the type of player to put one clear chance away? No. Hopefully he'll be able to set it up for someone who is better in front of goal, though.
shewore
He doesn't carry the greatest goal threat but as long as the team collectively carries a goal threat and he can play a part in that it needn't matter too much. Podolski probably carries a bigger goal threat than most but the problem with players who only score goals is that if they aren't scoring the team is playing with 10 men. For Podolski to prosper I get the impression you should just leave him hanging around the penalty area. It would be great to have a Suarez, RvP or Aguero who score and contribute but there're few of those about and, on the positive side, but it could be worse - we could have bought a Soldado - or a Torres even.
Amos.
Incidentally how often does Suarez score against the top teams?
Amos.
He can start scoring against em after this weekend
shewore
Completely agree that Giroud will never be as good as the aforementioned or the elite striker that we so crave. He does a specific job and in my opinion he plays his heart out like our entire team should and do. He's quite the warrior and whilst defenders may not be afraid of his out and out goal threat they do not relish competing with him constantly in the 50/50's and aerial duals. Giroud I think brings out our midfield and bit further into the attck, playing off him he's a lighting rod for long balls but also criticism when we do not threaten the goal.

I can't quite rmember who said it, perhaps I read it on Arseblog, but it seems like Giroud is acting as an educational striker, he helps us play and that when the rest of our team have really clicked and kicked on we will not rely so much on a striker of his kind. This then means we can play the smaller faster goal threat striker who we seem to be chasing in the transfer market. When we have learned to play completely within ourselves then I think Wenger will go all out for the 'elite' striker to set us apart. Perhaps this is a load of ********* we would also lose a defensive asset in Giroud but I think we could do a lot wose.

Nwankwo25
But my god he's a handsome one isn't he. I don't see Aguero or Suarez making defenders hot under the collar with a flutter of the eyelashes!
Nwankwo25
Poor Giroud! It seems this piece wants to make him into what he is not while at the same time conceding that he is a different type of player. The players he is being compared to play on teams that have little in common style-wise with Arsenal (Everton?). Not that comparisons can't and shouldn't be made with apparently similar or even dissimilar types. The point of the article seems to this reader as essentially aspirational in that Giroud should be a striker of our dreams. Of course he is not and so by extension there is a vacuum to be filled. I think Shewore is right: the concern about Giroud should be his durability through a long campaign. Nothing more, nothing less.
NYArse
I like Giroud, he works very hard for the team and is doing a very specific job in the team and it's working. I still wouldn't say no to Aguero/Suarez though...
FuiKaka
NY - I'll be honest and say that i rarely get the point you are trying to make. The piece simply looks at Giroud and compares him to other similar strikers or there. And yes Everton play a similar formation and style to us, similar mind not an exact copy. Stop trying to sound so smart all the time mate and actually contribute to the debate, not distance yourself from it!
Galway Gooner
GG, surprise a bit about your reaction. I do enjoy your write-up as a whole. The intention is not to try 'to sound so smart.' And it is disappointing that I have not been making my point. I often wonder about the 'question' being addressed or if there is indeed any 'question' to be addressed. Then I look at the thesis etc and the conclusion. If that is not contributing to the debate then my apologies to you and all. I never for a second thought I was distancing myself. I am sorry you feel this way but honestly I have always thought the interesting thing about VA is the chance to push back at the lead writers. Will learn to write clearly.
NYArse
I think the problem is that you use too many big words NY! ;-)

Reading my comment I did come across a bit harsh, in my defence it was early in the morning and it's been raining here for pretty much the last month!

No harm was intended and no harm was taken from yours. We're all Gooners here and you're right in that we want to promote healthy debate at VA.

Sorry for coming across as a bit of a dic-head mate.

Galway Gooner
Cheers, GG. No hard feelings!
NYArse
I am in agreement with Galway Gooner. I like Giroud and he has a lot of qualities but at present he is not "top top" in Arsene speak. If he can score nine in the last fourteen a place in Arsenal's history probably awaits, but can he do it? Hopefully he will prove GG and myself wrong and make that difference in some of the "big" games which he has not done thus far, as this is the next step up for him.
grouvillegooner
Let's not get ahead of ourselves, giroud is a stop-gap for wenger. Not his ideal striker but one of the best in his 'functional role' . He is a plan b for wenger, unfortunately our plan A has flown coup ( van P) we are yet to replace our plan A, which is why wenger bid for suarez, and higuain and has scouts watching Diego Costa.
nna
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Arsenal Articles

Arsenal v Burnley Match Preview (Friday October 31 2014)

Kroenke's 3m Can Be Understood (Wednesday October 29 2014)

Three Points And No Mistake! (Sunday October 26 2014)

Sunderland v Arsenal Match Preview (Friday October 24 2014)

A Busted Flush (Thursday October 23 2014)

Isn't It The Sign Of A Great Team? (Thursday October 23 2014)

Team News: Anderlecht vs Arsenal (Wednesday October 22 2014)

Anderlecht v Arsenal Match Preview (Tuesday October 21 2014)

Archived Arsenal Articles

List All Vital Arsenal Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Sunderland 0 - 2 Arsenal
Arsenal 2 - 2 Hull City
Chelsea 2 - 0 Arsenal
Arsenal 1 - 1 Spurs
Aston Villa 0 - 3 Arsenal
Arsenal 2 - 2 Man City

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
2. Southampton 9 6 1 2 15 19
3. Man City 9 5 2 2 9 17
4. West Ham 9 5 1 3 5 16
5. Arsenal 9 3 5 1 4 14
6. Swansea 9 4 2 3 3 14
7. Liverpool 9 4 2 3 1 14
8. Man Utd 9 3 4 2 3 13

Breaking League News

Aston Villa vs Tottenham Hotspur.
Spurs : 01/11/2014 12:53:00
Liverpool: Newcastle vs. LFC Team News
Liverpool : 01/11/2014 11:49:00
Match Day Moments - QPR (h)
Chelsea : 01/11/2014 09:24:00
Lawro v Mystic Mug - Villa v Spurs
Aston Villa : 01/11/2014 08:44:00
Gunners Aim at Burnley in No Man`s Land!
Burnley : 01/11/2014 08:16:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Who is most likely to end as top scorer this season?
Suggested By:  
Campbell 5%
Giroud 2%
Podolski 2%
Ramsey 2%
Sanchez 36%
Sanogo 2%
Walcott 5%
Welbeck 46%